Back

Manipulating the rapid consolidation periods in a learning task affects general skills more than statistical learning

Fanuel, L.; Szucs-Bencze, L.; Quentin, R.; Nemeth, D.; Vekony, T.

2022-05-27 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.05.05.490763 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Memory consolidation processes have traditionally been investigated from the perspective of hours or days. However, the latest developments in memory research showed that memory consolidation processes could occur even within seconds, possibly due to the neural replay of just-practiced memory traces during short breaks. Here, we investigate this rapid form of consolidation during statistical learning. We aim to answer (a) whether this rapid consolidation occurs in implicit statistical learning and general skill learning and (b) whether the duration of rest periods affects these two learning types differently. Participants performed a widely used statistical learning task - the Alternating Serial Reaction Time (ASRT) task - that enables us to measure implicit statistical and general skill learning separately. The ASRT task consisted of 25 learning blocks with a rest period between the blocks. In a between-subjects design, the length of the rest periods was fixed at 15 or 30 seconds, or the participants could control the length themselves. We found that the duration of rest periods does not affect the amount of statistical knowledge acquired but does change the dynamics of learning. Shorter rest periods led to better learning during the learning blocks, whereas longer rest periods promoted learning also in the between block rest periods, possibly due to the higher amount of replay. Moreover, we found weaker general skill learning in the self-paced group than in the fixed rest period groups. These results suggest that distinct learning processes are differently affected by the duration of short rest periods.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Science of Learning
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.6%
3
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.6%
5
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
10
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.7%
11
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
12
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
13
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
15
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
16
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
17
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
18
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.1%
20
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
22
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.0%
26
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
27
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
30
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%