School immunization coverage during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cohort study
Sell, H.; Paudel, Y. R.; Voaklander, D.; MacDonald, S. E.
Show abstract
Few studies have assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on immunization coverage for adolescents, and little is known about how coverage has changed throughout the pandemic. We aimed to: (1) assess the change in coverage for school-based vaccines in Alberta, Canada resulting from the pandemic; (2) determine whether coverage differed by geographic health zone and school type; and (3) ascertain whether coverage has returned to pre-pandemic levels. Using a retrospective cohort design, we used administrative health data to compare coverage for human papillomavirus (HPV) and meningococcal conjugate A, C, Y, W-135 (MenC-ACYW) vaccines in Alberta, Canada between pre-pandemic (2017-2018 school year) and pandemic (2019-2020 and 2020-2021 school years) cohorts (N=289,420). Coverage was also compared by health zone and authority type. The 2019-2020 cohort was followed over one year to assess catch-up. Compared to 2017-2018, immunization coverage for HPV was significantly lower in the 2019-2020 (absolute difference: 60.8%; 95% CI: 60.4-61.3%) and 2020-2021 cohorts (absolute difference: 59.9%; 95% CI: 59.4-60.3%). There was a smaller, significant decline in MenC-ACYW coverage comparing 2017-2018 to 2019-2020 (absolute difference: 6.1%; 95% CI: 5.6-6.5%) and 2020-2021 (absolute difference: 32.2%; 95% CI: 31.6-32.7%). Private schools had low coverage overall, while coverage fluctuated by zone. During follow-up of the 2019-2020 cohort, coverage for HPV and MenC-ACYW increased from 5.6% to 50.2%, and 80.7% to 83.0%, respectively. There was a substantial decrease in school-based immunization coverage during the COVID-19 pandemic, and coverage has not returned to pre-pandemic levels, suggesting further catch-up is needed.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuity of routine immunization programs in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on routine immunization coverage in children under 2 years old in Ontario, Canada: A retrospective cohort study 94%
- Comparative effectiveness of four COVID-19 vaccines, BNT162b2 mRNA, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCov-19 and NVX-CoV2373 against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) infection 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time-Varying Effectiveness of Three Covid-19 Vaccines in Puerto Rico 93%
- Effectiveness of CoronaVac in the setting of high SARS-CoV-2 P.1 variant transmission in Brazil: A test-negative case-control study 92%
- Protection of homologous and heterologous boosters after primary schemes of rAd26-rAd5, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BBIBP-CorV during the Omicron outbreak in adults of 50 years and older in Argentina: a test-negative case-control study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychosocial factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the UK: a prospective cohort study (CoVAccS – wave 3) 94%
- Benefit-Risk Assessment Of COVID-19 Vaccine, Mrna (Mrna-1273) For Males Age 18-64 Years 91%
- The projected cost-effectiveness and budget impact of Alternative HPV Vaccines in Senegal: A Modelling Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine: Results from a population-based survey in Canada 93%
- Transition to Endemic: Acceptance of Additional COVID-19 Vaccine Doses Among Canadian Adults in A National Cross-Sectional Survey 93%
- COVID-19 vaccines effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant infection: a population-based case-control study in St. Petersburg, Russia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of an Inactivated Covid-19 Vaccine with Homologous and Heterologous Boosters against Omicron in Brazil 94%
- Higher serological responses and increased vaccine effectiveness demonstrate the value of extended vaccine schedules in combatting COVID-19 in England 94%
- Racial and ethnic differences in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.