Development and evaluation of low-volume tests to detect and characterise antibodies to SARS-CoV-2
Halliday, A.; Long, A. E.; Baum, H. E.; Thomas, A. C.; Shelley, K. L.; Oliver, E.; Gupta, K.; Francis, O.; Kavanagh Williamson, M.; Di Bartolo, N.; Randell, M. J.; Ben Khoud, Y.; Kelland, I.; Mortimer, G.; Ball, O.; Plumptre, C.; Chandler, K.; Obst, U.; Secchi, M.; Piemonti, L.; Lampasona, V.; Smith, J.; Gregorova, M.; Knezevic, L.; Metz, J.; Barr, R.; Morales-Aza, B.; Oliver, J.; Collingwood, L.; Hitchings, B.; Ring, S.; Wooldridge, L.; Rivino, L.; Timpson, N. J.; McKernon, J.; Muir, P.; Hamilton, F. W.; Arnold, D.; Woolfson, D. N.; Goenka, A.; Davidson, A. D.; Toye, A. M.; Berger, I.; Bailey
Show abstract
Low-volume antibody assays can be used to track SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in settings where active testing for virus is limited and remote sampling is optimal. We developed 12 ELISAs detecting total or antibody isotypes to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid, spike protein or its receptor binding domain (RBD), 3 anti-RBD isotype specific luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assays and a novel Spike-RBD bridging LIPS total-antibody assay. We utilised pre-pandemic (n=984) and confirmed/suspected recent COVID-19 sera taken pre-vaccination rollout in 2020 (n=269). Assays measuring total antibody discriminated best between pre-pandemic and COVID-19 sera and were selected for diagnostic evaluation. In the blind evaluation, two of these assays (Spike Pan ELISA and Spike-RBD Bridging LIPS assay) demonstrated >97% specificity and >92% sensitivity for samples from COVID- 19 patients taken >21 days post symptom onset or PCR test. These assays offered better sensitivity for the detection of COVID-19 cases than a commercial assay which requires 100-fold larger serum volumes. This study demonstrates that low-volume in- house antibody assays can provide good diagnostic performance, and highlights the importance of using well-characterised samples and controls for all stages of assay development and evaluation. These cost-effective assays may be particularly useful for seroprevalence studies in low and middle-income countries.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Highly sensitive and specific multiplex antibody assays to quantify immunoglobulins M, A and G against SARS-CoV-2 antigens 98%
- Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels are concordant across multiple platforms but are not fully predictive of sterilizing immunity 96%
- Clinical evaluation of the Abbott Alinity SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific quantitative IgG and IgM assays in infected, recovered, and vaccinated groups 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A highly sensitive and specific SARS-CoV-2 spike- and nucleoprotein-based fluorescent multiplex immunoassay (FMIA) to measure IgG, IgA and IgM class antibodies 96%
- Rapid and Quantitative Detection of Human Antibodies Against the 2019 Novel Coronavirus SARS CoV2 and its Variants as a Result of Vaccination and Infection 95%
- Implementation and extended evaluation of the Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and its contribution to the United Kingdom’s COVID-19 public health response 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel ELISA protocol links pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 reactive antibodies with endemic coronavirus immunity and age and reveals improved serologic identification of acute COVID-19 via multi-parameter detection 97%
- Towards Internationally standardised humoral Immune Correlates of Protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease 96%
- Design and Performance Characteristics of the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.