Dopamine D1 agonist effects in late-stage Parkinson's disease
Lewis, M. M.; Van Scoy, L. J.; Mailman, R. B.; De Jesus, S.; Hakun, J. G.; Kong, L.; Yang, Y.; Snyder, B.; Duvvuri, S.; Gray, D. L.; Huang, X.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSCurrent pharmacotherapy has limited efficacy and/or intolerable side effects in late-stage Parkinsons disease (LsPD) patients whose daily life depends primarily on caregivers and palliative care. Clinical metrics inadequately gauge efficacy in LsPD patients. ObjectiveExplore if a D1/5 dopamine agonist will have efficacy in LsPD that will be detected most sensitively by caregivers in a phase I study. MethodsA double-blind controlled phase Ia/b study compared the D1/5 agonist PF-06412562 to levodopa/carbidopa in six LsPD patients. Throughout the study, caregivers were with the patients. Assessments included standard quantitative scales of motor function (MDS-UPDRS-III), alertness (Glasgow Coma and Stanford Sleepiness Scales), and cognition (Severe Impairment and Frontal Assessment Batteries) at baseline (Day 1) and thrice daily during drug testing (Days 2 and 3). Clinicians and caregivers completed clinical impression of change questionnaires, and caregivers participated in a qualitative exit interview. Blinded triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data was used to integrate findings. ResultsNeither traditional scales, nor clinician impression of change, detected consistent differences between treatments in the five participants who completed the study. Conversely, the overall caregiver data strongly favored PF-06412562 over levodopa in four of five patients. The most meaningful improvements converged on motor, alertness, and engagement. ConclusionD1/5 agonists may offer potential benefit for LsPD patients. Caregiver perspectives with mixed method analyses may overcome limitations in standard rater/clinician-based evaluations. Further studies are warranted and need to integrate caregiver input as an essential component of outcome evaluations. Trial Registration#ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03665454
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Timely referral for advanced therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Development of a screening tool 94%
- A Pilot Interventional Study on Feasibility and Effectiveness of the CUE1 device in Parkinson’s disease 93%
- Time perception reflects individual differences in motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- α4β2 * Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptor Target Engagement in Parkinson Disease Gait-Balance Disorders 97%
- Persistent racial disparities in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease 93%
- Development of Parkinson’s disease and its relationship with incidentally-discovered white matter disease and covert brain infarction in a real world cohort 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.