Back

PCR Testing in the UK During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic - Evidence from FOI Requests

Jefferson, T.; Dietrich, M.; Brassey, J.; Heneghan, C.

2022-04-29 public and global health
10.1101/2022.04.28.22274341 medRxiv
Show abstract

Polymerase Chain Reaction ("PCR") tests have been used to identify cases of COVID-19 during the course of the pandemic. Notably, PCR alone cannot differentiate between the presence of whole viruses (which can be transmitted and infect individuals) and small fragments of genetic material that are not infectious. A feature of PCR known as the cycle threshold (Ct) can be used to discriminate between these states, but the relationship between Ct and infectiousness is still poorly understood. This well-known limitation of the test compromises the identification of cases and their trends, and consequently those measures to interrupt transmission (such as isolation) that are undertaken on the basis of reliably identifying infectious individuals. Here, we interrogate the public authorities understanding of PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 in the UK by accessing Freedom of Information requests submitted in 2020-21.We searched WhatDoTheyKnow and found 300 FOI requests, from over 150 individuals. We grouped their questions into four themes addressing the number of tests in use, the reporting of cycle thresholds ( Ct), the Ct values themselves, and the accuracy of tests. The number of validated tests in use in the UK is currently not clear: In FOI responses, Public Health England (PHE) report it may be "80" or "85". However, European regulations suggest there could be over 400 different CE marked tests available on the market and available for use. Laboratories have a statutory duty to report positive cases to PHE, but they do not have to advise which tests they are using nor submit Ct values. Only two FOI responses provided answers on Ct values, indicating that in a set time span, 24-38% of the Ct values were over 30. The most common FOI asked if there was a cycle threshold for positivity. In those that responded, the Ct for a positive result varied from 30 to 45. We found limited information on the technical accuracy of the tests. Several responses stated there is no static, specific or standard cycle threshold. The current system requires significant changes to ensure it offers accurate diagnostic data to enable effective clinical management of SARS-CoV-2. PCR is an important and powerful tool, but its systematic misuse and misreporting risk undermining its usefulness and credibility.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.6%
2
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
3
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
4
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.8%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
8
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
16
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
17
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
18
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
19
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
21
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
23
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
29
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%