Back

StandardRat: A multi-center consensus protocol to enhance functional connectivity specificity in the rat brain

Grandjean, J.; Desrosiers-Gregoire, G.; Anckaerts, C.; Angeles-Valdez, D.; Ayad, F.; Barriere, D. A.; Blockx, I.; Bortel, A. B.; Broadwater, M.; Cardoso, B. M.; Celestine, M.; Chavez-Negrete, J. E.; Choi, S.; Christiaen, E.; Clavijo, P.; Colon-Perez, L.; Cramer, S.; Daniele, T.; Dempsey, E.; Diao, Y.; Doelemeyer, A.; Dopfel, D.; Dvorakova, L.; Falfan-Melgoza, C.; Fernandes, F. F.; Fowler, C. F.; Fuentes-Ibanez, A.; Garin, C.; Gelderman, E.; Golden, C. E.; Guo, C. C.; Henckens, M. J.; Hennessy, L. A.; Herman, P.; Hofwijks, N.; Horien, C.; Ionescu, T. M.; Jones, J.; Kaesser, J.; Kim, E.; Lambers

2022-04-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.04.27.489658 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Task-free functional connectivity in animal models provides an experimental framework to examine connectivity phenomena under controlled conditions and allows comparison with invasive or terminal procedures. To date, animal acquisitions are performed with varying protocols and analyses that hamper result comparison and integration. We introduce StandardRat, a consensus rat functional MRI acquisition protocol tested across 20 centers. To develop this protocol with optimized acquisition and processing parameters, we initially aggregated 65 functional imaging datasets acquired in rats from 46 centers. We developed a reproducible pipeline for the analysis of rat data acquired with diverse protocols and determined experimental and processing parameters associated with a more robust functional connectivity detection. We show that the standardized protocol enhances biologically plausible functional connectivity patterns, relative to pre-existing acquisitions. The protocol and processing pipeline described here are openly shared with the neuroimaging community to promote interoperability and cooperation towards tackling the most important challenges in neuroscience.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.