Artificial Intelligence Model for Detecting Duodenal Endoscopic Changes on Images of Functional Dyspepsia
Mihara, H.; Nanjo, S.; Motoro, I.; Ando, T.; Fujinami, H.; Yasuda, I.
Show abstract
Introduction and AimsRecently, it has been suggested that the duodenum may be the pathological locus of functional dyspepsia (FD), but there are few reports on the presence of duodenal changes on imaging in FD. MethodsDuodenal images acquired at our hospital with the presence or absence of the term "functional dyspepsia" on the electronic medical record, and H. pylori (HP) infection status on the Japan Endoscopy Database were obtained. The Google Cloud Platform AutoML Vision (single-label classification) was used to classify FD/HP current infection, versus FD/HP uninfected patients. We constructed an AI model to distinguish four groups, which included FD/HP current infection, FD/HP uninfected, non-FD/current infection, and non-FD/HP uninfected, and calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Patient images with other organic diseases such as gastrointestinal cancer, peptic ulcer, postoperative abdominal organs, and gastroesophageal reflux disease were excluded. Narrow band imaging and dye-spread images were also excluded. ResultsThe overall AUC of the four groups was 0.47 (FD/HP current infection 0.20, FD/HP uninfected 0.35, non-FD/current infection 0.46, non-FD/HP uninfected 0.74). Next, using the same images, we constructed a model to determine the presence or absence of FD in HP infected patients only. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AUC were 71.4%, 66.7%, 50.0%, 83.3%, and 0.84, respectively. However, when we constructed a model to determine the presence of FD only in uninfected HP patients, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AUC were 58.3%, 100%, 100%, 77.3%, and 0.85, respectively. ConclusionThe results suggest that the duodenal imaging AL model may be able to determine the presence or absence of FD to a certain degree in HP-infected or uninfected patients.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 96%
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 91%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benchmarking Deep Learning-based Image Retrieval of Oral Tumor Histology 93%
- The Impact of Fasting the Holy Month of Ramadan on Colorectal Cancer Patients and Two Tumor Biomarkers: A Tertiary-Care Hospital Experience 90%
- “One more tool in the tool belt”: A qualitative interview study investigating patient and clinician opinions on the integration of psychometrics into routine testing for disorders of gut-brain interaction 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence in laryngeal endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 95%
- Aerodigestoscopy (ADS): A retrospective examination of the feasibility, safety, and comfort of a new procedure for the evaluation of physiological disorders of the aerodigestive tract 92%
- Procalcitonin to Predict Severity of Acute Cholangitis and Need for Urgent Biliary Decompression: Systematic Scoping Review 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.