Back

Artificial Intelligence Model for Detecting Duodenal Endoscopic Changes on Images of Functional Dyspepsia

Mihara, H.; Nanjo, S.; Motoro, I.; Ando, T.; Fujinami, H.; Yasuda, I.

2022-04-28 gastroenterology
10.1101/2022.04.26.22274340 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction and AimsRecently, it has been suggested that the duodenum may be the pathological locus of functional dyspepsia (FD), but there are few reports on the presence of duodenal changes on imaging in FD. MethodsDuodenal images acquired at our hospital with the presence or absence of the term "functional dyspepsia" on the electronic medical record, and H. pylori (HP) infection status on the Japan Endoscopy Database were obtained. The Google Cloud Platform AutoML Vision (single-label classification) was used to classify FD/HP current infection, versus FD/HP uninfected patients. We constructed an AI model to distinguish four groups, which included FD/HP current infection, FD/HP uninfected, non-FD/current infection, and non-FD/HP uninfected, and calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Patient images with other organic diseases such as gastrointestinal cancer, peptic ulcer, postoperative abdominal organs, and gastroesophageal reflux disease were excluded. Narrow band imaging and dye-spread images were also excluded. ResultsThe overall AUC of the four groups was 0.47 (FD/HP current infection 0.20, FD/HP uninfected 0.35, non-FD/current infection 0.46, non-FD/HP uninfected 0.74). Next, using the same images, we constructed a model to determine the presence or absence of FD in HP infected patients only. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AUC were 71.4%, 66.7%, 50.0%, 83.3%, and 0.84, respectively. However, when we constructed a model to determine the presence of FD only in uninfected HP patients, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AUC were 58.3%, 100%, 100%, 77.3%, and 0.85, respectively. ConclusionThe results suggest that the duodenal imaging AL model may be able to determine the presence or absence of FD to a certain degree in HP-infected or uninfected patients.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.