Back

Using Explainable-AI to Find Geospatial Environmental and Sociodemographic Predictors of Suicide Attempts

Pavicic, M.; Walker, A. M.; Sullivan, K. A.; Lagergren, J.; Cliff, A.; Romero, J.; Streich, J.; Garvin, M. R.; MVP Suicide Exemplar Workgroup, the Million Veteran Program, ; Pestian, J.; McMahon, B.; Oslin, D. W.; Beckham, J. C.; Kimbrel, N. A.; Jacobson, D. A.

2022-04-28 public and global health
10.1101/2022.04.26.22274333 medRxiv
Show abstract

Despite a global decrease in suicide rates in recent years, death by suicide has increased in the United States. It is therefore imperative to identify the risk factors associated with suicide attempts in order to combat this growing epidemic. In this study, we use an explainable-artificial intelligence method, iterative Random Forest, to predict suicide attempts using data from the Million Veteran Program. Our predictive model incorporates multiple environmental variables (e.g., elevation, light wavelength absorbance, temperature, humidity, etc) at ZIP code-level geospatial resolution. We additionally consider demographic variables from the American Community Survey as well as the number of firearms and alcohol vendors per 10,000 people in order to assess the contributions of proximal environment, access to means, and restraint decrease to suicide attempts. Our results show that geographic areas with higher concentrations of married males living with spouses are predictive of lower rates of suicide attempts, whereas geographic areas where males are more likely to live alone and to rent housing are predictive of higher rates of suicide attempts. We also identified climatic features that were associated with suicide attempt risk by age group. Additionally, we observed that firearms and alcohol vendors were associated with increased risk for suicide attempts irrespective of the age group examined, but that their effects were small in comparison to the top features. Taken together, our findings highlight the importance of social determinants and environmental factors in understanding suicide risk among veterans.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 1%
15.0%
2
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
3
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
4
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
5
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
6
European Psychiatry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
8
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.8%
10
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
12
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
13
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
14
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
The British Journal of Psychiatry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
19
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
20
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.1%
22
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
23
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
26
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
27
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
28
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
29
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
30
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%