Back

Cryo-electron tomography of the apicomplexan invasion machinery in its native state reveals rigid body motion of the conoid and docked secretory machinery

Gui, L.; O'Shaughnessy, W. J.; Cai, K.; Reetz, E.; Reese, M. L.; Nicastro, D.

2022-04-24 biophysics
10.1101/2022.04.23.489287 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The apical complex is a specialized collection of cytoskeletal and secretory machinery in apicomplexan parasites, which include the pathogens that cause malaria and toxoplasmosis. Its structure and mechanism of motion are poorly understood. We used cryo-FIB-milling and cryo-electron tomography to visualize the 3D-structure of the apical complex in its protruded and retracted states. Averages of conoid-fibers revealed their polarity and unusual nine-protofilament arrangement with associated proteins connecting and likely stabilizing the fibers. Neither the structure of the conoidfibers nor the architecture of the spiral-shaped conoid complex change during protrusion or retraction. Thus, the conoid moves as a rigid body, and is not spring-like and compressible, as previously suggested. Instead, the apical-polar-rings (APR), previously considered rigid, dilate during conoid protrusion. We identified actin-like filaments connecting the conoid and APR during protrusion, suggesting a role during conoid movements. Furthermore, our data capture the parasites in the act of secretion during conoid protrusion.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
31.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Cell
○ 431 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
The EMBO Journal
○ 309 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Science
● 477 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
7
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
236 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
Molecular Biology of the Cell
● 311 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Structure
○ 193 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
10
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.6%
11
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 15%
2.4%
12
Journal of Structural Biology
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Journal of Cell Biology
● 392 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
PLOS Pathogens
● 820 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
15
Life Science Alliance
● 285 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
16
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
17
mBio
● 833 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
18
Microscopy and Microanalysis
◐ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
20
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.0%
21
Development
● 497 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
EMBO Reports
○ 263 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
23
Journal of Cell Science
● 393 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.