A comparison of different methods for handling measurements affected by medication use
Choi, J.; Dekkers, O. M.; le Cessie, S.
Show abstract
In epidemiological research it is common to encounter measurements affected by medication use, such as blood pressure lowered by antihypertensive drugs. When one is interested in the relation between the variables not affected by medication, ignoring medication use can cause bias. Several methods have been proposed, but the problem is often ignored or handled with generic methods, such as excluding individuals on medication or adjusting for medication use in the analysis. This study aimed to investigate methods for handling measurements affected by medication use when one is interested in the relation between the unaffected variables and to provide guidance for how to optimally handle the problem. We focused on linear regression and distinguish between the situation where the affected measurement is an exposure, confounder or outcome. In the Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity study and in several simulated settings, we compared generic and more advanced methods, such as substituting or adding a fixed value to the treated values, regression calibration, censored normal regression, Heckmans treatment model and multiple imputation methods. We found that often-used methods such as adjusting for medication use could result in substantial bias and that methods for handling medication use should be chosen cautiously.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning 94%
- Quantitative bias analysis in practice: Review of software for regression with unmeasured confounding 92%
- Comparison of Bayesian networks, G-estimation and linear models to estimate causal treatment effects in aggregated N-of-1 trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing riskCommunicator: an R package to obtain interpretable effect estimates for public health 95%
- Development and Validation of the Michigan Chronic Disease Simulation Model (MICROSIM) 93%
- Optimization of nutritional strategies using a mechanistic computational model in prediabetes: Application to the J-DOIT1 study data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Bias amplification of unobserved confounding in pharmacoepidemiological studies using indication-based sampling: there is no free lunch in restricting the sample to those with a particular drug-indication 95%
- Causal Forests versus Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting to adjust for Cluster-Level Confounding: A Parametric and Plasmode Simulation Study based on US Hosptial Electronic Health Record Data 92%
- Using quantitative bias analysis to adjust for misclassification of COVID-19 outcomes: An applied example of inhaled corticosteroids and COVID-19 outcomes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensitivity to missing not at random dropout in clinical trials: use and interpretation of the Trimmed Means Estimator 93%
- Toward Evaluation of Disseminated Effects of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder within Provider-Based Clusters Using Routinely-Collected Health Data 92%
- Bias reduction and inference for electronic health record data under selection and phenotype misclassification: three case studies 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.