Back

Does fatigue influence joint-specific work and ground force production during the first steps of maximal accelerative running?

Vial, S.; Cochrane Wilkie, J.; Turner, M.; Scanlan, M.; Blazevich, A. J.

2022-04-22 biophysics
10.1101/2022.04.21.489102 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The rate of initial acceleration during the first steps of a maximal-effort (sprint) run often determines success or failure in prey capture and predator evasion, and is a vital factor of success in many modern sports. However, accelerative events are commonly performed after having already run considerable distances, and the associated fatigue should impair muscle force production and thus reduce acceleration rate. Despite this, the effects of running-induced fatigue on our ability to accelerate as well as the running technique used to achieve it has been incompletely studied. We recorded 3-D kinematics and ground reaction forces during the first three steps of the acceleration phase from a standing start before and after performing a high-speed, multi-directional, fatiguing run-walk protocol in well-trained running athletes who were habituated to accelerative sprinting. We found that the athletes were able to maintain their rate of initial acceleration despite changing running technique, which was associated with use of a more upright posture, longer ground contact time, increased vertical ground reaction impulse, decreased hip flexion and extension velocities, and a shift in peak joint moments, power, and positive work from the hip to the knee joint; no changes were detected in ankle joint function. Thus, a compensatory increase in knee joint function alleviated the reduction in hip flexor-extensor capacity. These acute adaptations may indicate that the hip extensors (gluteal and hamstring muscle groups) were more susceptible to fatigue than the ankle and knee musculature, and may thus be a primary target for interventions promoting fatigue resistance.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.1%
2
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.3%
6
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
7
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
9
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
12
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%