Back

Microglial inflammatory activation paradoxically improves glucose tolerance during diet-induced obesity

Douglass, J. D.; Valdearcos, M.; Ness, K. M.; Wyse-Jackson, A.; Dorfman, M. D.; Frey, J. M.; Niraula, A.; Banerjee, J.; Fasnacht, R.; Robblee, M.; Koliwad, S. K.; Thaler, J.

2022-04-20 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.04.19.488819 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hypothalamic gliosis associated with high fat diet (HFD) feeding increases susceptibility to hyperphagia and weight gain, and is therefore presumed to promote obesity-associated consequences such as glucose intolerance as well. Nevertheless, the body weight-independent contribution of microglial activation to glucose regulation has not been determined. Here we show that reducing microglial NF-{kappa}B signaling via cell-specific IKK{beta} deletion exacerbates HFD-induced glucose intolerance and insulin resistance despite reducing body weight and adiposity. This effect was associated with reduced activity of hypothalamic glucose sensing neurons. Conversely, a genetic approach to increase microglial inflammatory activity improved glucose tolerance independently of diet in lean rodents. To avoid confounding effects due to chronic alterations to microglial signaling pathways from dietary or genetic interventions, we developed an inducible model of microglial activation using DREADD-based chemogenetics. Gq-coupled GPCR activation rapidly increased microglial calcium levels, cytokine gene expression, and morphological hallmarks of inflammatory activation. In both lean and obese rodents, chemogenetic microglial activation caused a marked improvement in glucose tolerance along with increased activation of hypothalamic glucose sensing neurons, effects abrogated by central blockade of TNF signaling. Thus, while diet-induced microglial activation promotes weight gain, it may also serve an adaptive function--to prevent the deterioration of glucose tolerance associated with obesity, an important consideration for immune-modulating metabolic therapies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.