Back

Inducing Specific Chromosome Mis-Segregation in Human Cells

Tovini, L.; Johnson, S. C.; Andersen, A. M.; Spierings, D. C. J.; Wardenaar, R.; Foijer, F.; McClelland, S. E.

2022-04-19 cell biology
10.1101/2022.04.19.486691 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer cells display persistent underlying chromosomal instability that results in chromosome mis-segregation, the formation of micronuclei, and abnormal numbers of chromosomes (aneuploidy). These features are common to nearly all human cancers, with individual tumour types intriguingly exhibiting characteristic subsets of whole, and sub-chromosomal aneuploidies. To date, few methods to induce specific aneuploidies at will exist, hampering the investigation of functional consequences of recurrent aneuploidies. Moreover, although some human cell lines with specific aneuploidies exist, the acute cellular responses to specific chromosomal instability events remain unknown. We therefore investigated the possibility of sabotaging the mitotic segregation of specific chromosomes using nuclease-dead CRISPR-Cas9 (dCas9) as a cargo carrier to specific genomic loci. We recruited the kinetochore-nucleating domain of centromere protein CENP-T to assemble ectopic kinetochores either near the centromere of chromosome 9, or the telomere of chromosome 1. Ectopic kinetochore assembly led to increased chromosome instability and aneuploidy of the target chromosomes, providing the potential to create designer karyotypes and study their immediate downstream cellular responses in a wide range of cell types. Overall, our findings provide new insights into ectopic kinetochore biology, and also represent an important step towards investigating the role of specific aneuploidy and chromosome mis-segregation events in diseases associated with aneuploidy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.