Back

SLCO5A1 and synaptic assembly genes contribute to impulsivity in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

Panjwani, N.; Shakeshaft, A.; Roshandel, D.; Lin, F.; Collingwood, A.; Hall, A.; Keenan, K.; Deneubourg, C.; Mirabella, F.; Topp, S.; Zarubova, J.; Thomas, R. H.; Talvik, I.; Syvertsen, M.; Striano, P.; Smith, A. B.; Selmer, K. K.; Rubboli, G.; Orsini, A.; Ng, C. C.; Moller, R. S.; Lim, K. S.; Hamandi, K.; Greenberg, D. A.; Gesche, J.; Gardella, E.; Fong, C. Y.; Beier, C. P.; Andrade, D. M.; Jungbluth, H.; Richardson, M. P.; Pastore, A.; Fanto, M.; Pal, D.; Strug, L. J.

2022-04-21 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2022.04.19.22273994 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introductory ParagraphElevated impulsivity is a key component of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), bipolar disorder and epilepsy1-5. We performed a genome-wide association, colocalization and pathway analysis of impulsivity in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). We identify genome-wide associated SNPs at 8q13.3 (p=7.5 x 10-9) and 10p11.21 (p=3.6 x 10-8). The 8q13.3 locus colocalizes with SLCO5A1 expression quantitative trait loci in cerebral cortex (p=9.5 x 10-3). SLCO5A1 codes for a membrane-bound organic anion transporter6 and upregulates synapse assembly/organisation genes7. Pathway analysis also demonstrates 9.3-fold enrichment for synaptic assembly genes (p=0.03) including NRXN1, NLGN1 and PTPRD. RNAi knockdown of Oatp30B, the Drosophila homolog of SLCO5A1, causes both over-reactive startling behaviour (p=8.7 x 10-3) and increased seizure-like events (p=6.8 x 10-7). Polygenic risk score for ADHD correlates with impulsivity scores (p=1.60 x 10-3), demonstrating shared genetic contributions. SLCO5A1 loss-of-function represents a novel impulsivity and seizure mechanism. Synaptic assembly genes may inform the aetiology of impulsivity in health and disease.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.