A multi-continental analysis of the responses of freshwater food webs to climate and land use change
Barbosa, G. P.; Siqueira, T.
Show abstract
O_LIFood web responses to environmental change are not straightforward to understand as they occur through an intricate arrangement of direct and indirect effects. Although previous investigations have advanced knowledge on freshwater food web structure, we must better understand the intricate relationships between the main drivers of environmental change and trophic networks in lentic and lotic ecosystems. C_LIO_LIWe compiled multicontinental data to investigate how climate and land use change are related to the structure of freshwater food webs, considering the inherent differences in lentic and lotic ecosystems. We analyzed the direct and indirect relationships between land use intensity, and temperature and precipitation temporal trends, and food webs using multi-group structural equation modeling. C_LIO_LIThe strength and direction of the relationships between climate, land use, and food webs varied considerably among lentic and lotic ecosystems, but most indicated indirect effects through the number of links in the network. While network connectance both increased and decreased with land use and climate change, the number of trophic levels decreased with land use intensity and maximum temperature and increased with increasing precipitation. Omnivory increased with land use intensity in both ecosystems but was negatively related to changes on maximum temperature in lake food webs. C_LIO_LIEven though food webs are expected to become more connected in face of disturbances, and our work supported this regarding local warming, the negative relationships between network connectance and land use intensification suggests that food webs become more specialized at disturbed sites. On the other hand, reduction in the number of trophic levels indicates the loss of top consumers in face of warming and increasing land use intensity. C_LIO_LIThe response of food webs in both lentic and lotic ecosystems to climate and land use change occurred mostly through changes in species interactions. Our results indicate that the intensification of land use makes food webs more specialized, with less trophic levels. Also, inherent aspects of freshwater ecosystems seemed to play a major role in the way food webs respond to disturbance and must be considered to fully understand and predict the effects of global changes on freshwater biodiversity. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ecological theory predicts ecosystem stressor interactions in freshwater ecosystems, but highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the additive null model 93%
- A multidimensional framework for measuring biotic novelty: How novel is a community? 93%
- Dispersal provides trophic-level dependent insurance against a heatwave in freshwater ecosystems 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unifying ecosystem resistance, resilience, and recovery from extreme stress into a single statistical framework 93%
- Spatial community variability: Interactive effects of predators and isolation on stochastic community assembly 93%
- Interplay between the paradox of enrichment and nutrient cycling in food webs 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Top predator introduction changes the effects of spatial isolation on freshwater community structure 94%
- Local biodiversity change reflects interactions among changing abundance, evenness and richness 94%
- Metacommunities from bacteria to birds: stronger environmental effects in mediterranean than in tropical ponds. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Putting the Asymmetric Response Concept to the test: modeling multiple stressor exposure and release in a stream food web 95%
- Ecosystem services in connected catchment to coast ecosystems: monitoring to detect emerging trends 92%
- The relationship between land cover and microbial community composition in European lakes 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.