Roles of Clamp Closing and Allosteric Effects of Discriminator and Upstream Interactions on Downstream Elements in Stabilizing an E. coli RNA Polymerase-Promoter Open Complex
Wang, H.-C.; Stroncek, K. M.; Record, T.
Show abstract
E. coli RNA polymerase (2{beta}{beta}{omega}{sigma}70) forms stable open complexes (OC) at {lambda}PR and T7A1 promoters at 37 {degrees}C at similar rates but with very different lifetimes. To probe the origins of these differences, we determine OC lifetimes for full-length (FL) and downstream-truncated (DT) {lambda}PR and T7A1 promoter variants with eight combinations of discriminators and upstream elements. We find the discriminator is the major determinant of OC lifetime, while upstream elements modulate the discriminator effect. The very different lifetimes of these stable OC arise primarily from differences in [Formula], the free energy change for converting I2 (the initial open intermediate) to stable OC. [Formula] is twice as favorable for {lambda}PR-discriminator variants as for T7A1-discriminator variants. Truncation at +6 (DT+6) eliminates most differences in [Formula], destabilizing {lambda}PR-discriminator variants without affecting T7A1-discriminator variants. All DT+6 OC are much more stable and longer-lived than I2. Urea greatly destabilizes OC, primarily affecting RNAP interactions with +6 and upstream DNA. From these findings we deduce that stabilization of I2 involves closing the {beta}-clamp with extensive coupled folding to contact the region of promoter DNA from the transcription start-site to +6. Lifetime differences between DT+6, DT+12 and FL promoters allow dissection of contributions to OC stability from interactions of regions of the downstream duplex with downstream mobile elements (DME; {beta}-lobe, {beta}-clamp, {beta}-jaw). We propose an allosteric network by which differences in discriminator and -10 sequence are sensed by {sigma}1.2 and {beta}-gate loop and transmitted to {sigma}1.1 and {beta}-lobe to affect DME-duplex interactions that determine OC lifetime.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High-throughput Kinetics using Capillary Electrophoresis and Robotics (HiKER) platform used to Study T7, T3, and Sp6 RNA Polymerase Misincorporation 94%
- GCN sensitive protein translation in yeast 93%
- Biochemical analysis of human eIF4E-DCP2 interaction: Implications for the relationship between translation initiation and decapping 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterization of gene repression by designed transcription activator-like effector dimer proteins 94%
- DNA-sequence dependent positioning of the linker histone in a nucleosome: a single-pair FRET study 93%
- Switching Promotor Recognition of Phage RNA Polymerase in Silico Following Path along Lab Directed Evolution 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conformational dynamics during misincorporation and mismatch extension defined using a DNA polymerase with a fluorescent artificial amino acid 94%
- Auto-inhibitory regulation of DNA binding by the C-terminal tails of the mitochondrial transcription factors Mtf1 and TFB2M 94%
- An intrinsically disordered transcription activation domain alters the DNA binding affinity and specificity of NFκB p50/RelA 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.