Back

Air pollution exposure and mitochondrial DNA copy number in the UK Biobank

Hong, Y. S.; Battle, S. L.; Puiu, D.; Shi, W.; Pankratz, N.; Zhao, D.; Arking, D.; Guallar, E.

2022-04-19 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.04.18.22273996 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLow levels of mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) are a biomarker of mitochondrial dysfunction often induced by oxidative stress. Air pollution is a pervasive source of oxidative stress, but the association between air pollution exposure and mtDNA-CN is inconclusive. ObjectiveWe evaluated the association between long-term exposure to PM [≤] 10 {micro}m diameter (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) with mtDNA-CN in 195,196 adults in the UK Biobank study. MethodsAnnual average PM10 and NO2 concentrations were estimated using separate land-use regression models for years 2007 and 2010. mtDNA-CN was measured in blood samples collected between 2007 and 2010 and was calculated as the ratio of mitochondrial coverage to the nuclear genome coverage derived from whole-genome sequencing in 195,196 UK Biobank participants. We used standardized values (Z-scores) after log-transformation as the mtDNA-CN metric. ResultsThe median (interquartile range) annual average concentrations of PM10 and NO2 were 21.8 (20.3-23.6) and 28.9 (23.7-35.1) {micro}g/m3 in 2007, and 16.2 (15.5-17.1) and 27.8 (22.7-32.4) {micro}g/m3 in 2010. An increase of 10 {micro}g/m3 in annual average PM10 and NO2 exposure was associated with an adjusted difference in mtDNA-CN of -0.089 (95% confidence interval; -0.090, -0.087) and -0.018 (-0.018, -0.017), respectively. The associations persisted for lags of up to 3 years. PM2.5-10 was also inversely associated with mtDNA-CN. ConclusionsIn this large-scale study, long-term exposure to PM10 and NO2 were inversely associated with mtDNA-CN. These findings suggest that oxidative stress-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, reflected by reduced mtDNA-CN, may be an additional mechanism mediating the health effects of air pollution.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.