Induction of a CD8 T cell intrinsic DNA damage and repair response is associated with clinical response to PD-1 blockade in uterine cancer.
Muroyama, Y.; Manne, S.; Wellhausen, N.; Oldridge, D. A.; Greenplate, A. R.; Chilukuri, L.; Mathew, D.; Xu, C.; Herati, R. S.; Berger, S. L.; Huang, A. C.; June, C. H.; Zamarin, D.; Friedman, C. F.; Wherry, E. J.
Show abstract
Despite the success of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), many patients fail to achieve durable clinical benefit, and the underlying immunological mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated immune reinvigoration by ICB in advanced or recurrent hypermutated or microsatellite instability-high, mismatch repair deficient (MSI-H/MMRd) uterine cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1 (nivolumab). CD8 T cells underwent rapid pharmacodynamic proliferation 2-4 weeks after initiating PD-1 blockade. This immunological response, however, did not correlate with clinical response. We hypothesized that the T cell-intrinsic response to proliferative and genotoxic stress might contribute to the disparity between immunological and clinical response. We developed a high-dimensional single cell cytometric platform to simultaneously analyze T cell differentiation with changes in DNA damage and repair (DDR) pathways. This DDR-Immune platform revealed T cell subset-specific patterns of DDR, and distinct DDR pathways induced by different types of DNA damage. Applying this platform to MSI-H/MMRd or hypermutated uterine cancer patients revealed a signature of DDR exemplified by rapid increase in phosphorylated-ATM (pATM) intrinsic to CD8 T cells proliferating in response to PD-1 blockade that distinguished clinical responders and non-responders. ATM regulated transcriptional circuits in T cells were associated with better clinical response to PD-1 blockade. These findings highlight a previously unrecognized role for CD8 T cell-intrinsic DDR as a potential determinant of immune fitness and clinical outcome of PD-1 blockade therapy. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCEUsing high-dimensional immune and DNA damage response (DDR) profiling in T cell subsets we identified distinct signatures in anti-PD-1 treated MSI-H/hypermutated uterine cancer patients associated with clinical response versus non-response. Thus, T cell-intrinsic DDR is a potential determinant of immune responsiveness and clinical outcome to PD-1 blockade therapy in cancer.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A reservoir of stem-like CD8 T cells in the tumor-draining lymph node maintains the ongoing anti-tumor immune response 96%
- Single-Cell Multiomics Defines Tolerogenic Extrathymic Aire-Expressing Populations with Unique Homology to Thymic Epithelium 95%
- Distinct CD8+ T Cell Programming in the Tumor Microenvironment Contributes to Sex Bias in Bladder Cancer Outcome 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- TET2 regulates early and late transitions in exhausted CD8+ T-cell differentiation and limits CAR T-cell function 96%
- Therapeutic KRASG12C inhibition drives effective interferon-mediated anti-tumour immunity in immunogenic lung cancers 95%
- Selective disruption of lipid peroxide homeostasis in intratumoral regulatory T cells by targeting FSP1 enhances cancer immunity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The CD8+ T cell landscape of human brain metastases 95%
- Combined tumor and immune signals from genomes or transcriptomes predict outcomes of checkpoint inhibition in melanoma 94%
- Longitudinal analysis shows durable and broad immune memory after SARS-CoV-2 infection with persisting antibody responses and memory B and T cells 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct evolutionary paths in chronic lymphocytic leukemia during resistance to graft-versus-leukemia 95%
- Robust immune responses after one dose of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine dose in SARS-CoV-2 experienced individuals 94%
- Splicing modulators impair DNA damage response and induce killing of cohesin-mutant MDS/AML 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.