Resource sharing leads to the emergence of division of labour
Kreider, J. J.; Janzen, T.; Bernadou, A.; Elsner, D.; Kramer, B. H.; Weissing, F. J.
Show abstract
Division of labour occurs in a broad range of organisms. Yet, how division of labour can emerge in the absence of pre-existing interindividual differences is poorly understood. Using a simple but realistic model, we show that in a group of initially identical individuals, division of labour emerges spontaneously if returning foragers share part of their resources with other group members. In the absence of resource sharing, individuals follow an activity schedule of alternating between foraging and other tasks. If non-foraging individuals are fed by other individuals, their alternating activity schedule becomes interrupted, leading to task specialisation and the emergence of division of labour. Furthermore, nutritional differences between individuals reinforce division of labour. Such differences can be caused by increased metabolic rates during foraging or by dominance interactions during resource sharing. Our model proposes a plausible mechanism for the self-organised emergence of division of labour in animal groups of initially identical individuals. This mechanism could also play a role for the emergence of division of labour during the major evolutionary transitions to eusociality and multicellularity.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Positive interactions within and between populations decrease the likelihood of evolutionary rescue 97%
- Population structure across scales facilitates coexistence and spatial heterogeneity of antibiotic-resistant infections 97%
- Emergent multilevel selection in a simple spatial model of the evolution of altruism 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Competition for fluctuating resources reproduces statistics of species abundance over time across wide-ranging microbiotas 95%
- Conformist social learning leads to self-organised prevention against adverse bias in risky decision making 95%
- Collaborative hunting in artificial agents with deep reinforcement learning 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.