COVID-19 relevant genetic variants confirmed in an admixed population
Texis, T.; Cruz-Jaramilllo, J. L.; Garcia-Munoz, W.; Anzures-Cortes, L.; Hadadd-Talancon, L.; Sanchez-Garcia, S.; Jimenez-Martinez, M. d. C.; Perez-Barragan, E.; Nieto-Patlan, A.; Martinez-Ezquerro, J. D.; Rubio-Carrasco, K.; Rodriguez-Dorantes, M.; Cortes-Ramirez, S.; Mellado-Sanchez, G.; Perez-Tapia, S. M.; Gonzalez-Covarrubias, V.
Show abstract
The dissection of factors that contribute to COVID-19 infection and severity has overwhelmed the scientific community for almost 2 years. Current reports highlight the role of in disease incidence, progression, and severity. Here, we aimed to confirm the presence of previously reported genetic variants in an admixed population. Allele frequencies were assessed and compared between the general population (N=3079) for which at least 30% have not been infected with SARS-CoV2 as per July 2021 versus COVID-19 patients (N=106). Genotyping data from the Illumina GSA array was used to impute genetic variation for 14 COVID-relevant genes, using the 1000G phase 3 as reference based on the human genome assembly hg19, following current standard protocols and recommendations for genetic imputation. Bioinformatic and statistical analyses were performed using MACH v1.0, R, and PLINK. A total of 7953 variants were imputed on, ABO, CCR2, CCR9, CXCR6, DPP9, FYCO1, IL10RB/IFNAR2, LZTFL1, OAS1, OAS2, OAS3, SLC6A20, TYK2, and XCR1. Statistically significant allele differences were reported for 10 and 7 previously identified and confirmed variants, ABO rs657152, DPP9 rs2109069, LZTFL1 rs11385942, OAS1 rs10774671, OAS1 rs2660, OAS2 rs1293767, and OAS3 rs1859330 p<0.03. In addition, we identified 842 variants in these COVID-related genes with significant allele frequency differences between COVID patients and the general population (p-value <E-2 - E-179). Our observations confirm the presence of genetic differences in COVID-19 patients in an admixed population and prompts for the investigation of the statistical relevance of additional variants on these and other genes that could identify local and geographical patterns of COVID-19.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic landscape of rare autoinflammatory disease variants in Qatar and Middle Eastern populations through the integration of whole-genome and exome datasets 95%
- Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium in the Large Scale Genomic Sequencing Era 94%
- Admixture Mapping of Peripheral Artery Disease in a Dominican Population Reveals a Novel Risk Locus on 2q35 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common, low-frequency, rare, and ultra-rare coding variants contribute to COVID-19 severity 94%
- Multi-omics highlights ABO plasma protein as a causal risk factor for COVID-19 92%
- Whole genome sequencing of orofacial cleft trios from the Gabriella Miller Kids First Pediatric Research Consortium identifies a new locus on chromosome 21 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptional differences for COVID-19 Disease Map genes between males and females indicate a different basal immunophenotype relevant to the disease 94%
- Poking COVID-19: insights on genomic constraints among immune-related genes between Qatari and Italian populations 94%
- Characterization of the common genetic variation in the Spanish population of Navarre 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- “Immunogenetics of resistance to SARS-CoV-2 infection in discordant couples” 94%
- Genetic screening for TLR7 variants in young and previously healthy men with severe COVID-19: a case series 93%
- HLA-A*11:01:01:01, HLA*C*12:02:02:01-HLA-B*52:01:02:02, age and sex are associated with severity of Japanese COVID-19 with respiratory failure 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.