Back

More efficient and inclusive time-to-event trials with covariate adjustment: a simulation study

Momal, R.; Trichelair, P.; Blum, M.; Balazard, F.

2022-04-19 oncology
10.1101/2022.04.15.22273871 medRxiv
Show abstract

Adjustment for prognostic covariates increases the statistical power of randomized trials. The factors influencing increase of power are well-known for trials with continuous outcomes. Here, we study which factors influence power and sample size requirements in time-to-event trials. We consider both parametric simulations and simulations derived from the TCGA cohort of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients to assess how sample size requirements are reduced with covariate adjustment. Simulations demonstrate that the benefit of covariate adjustment increases with the prognostic performance of the adjustment covariate (C-index) and with the cumulative incidence of the event in the trial. For a covariate that has an intermediate prognostic performance (C-index=0.65), the reduction of sample size varies from 1.7% when cumulative incidence is of 10% to 26.5% when cumulative incidence is of 90%. Broadening eligibility criteria usually reduces statistical power while our simulations show that it can be maintained with adequate covariate adjustment. In a simulation of HCC trials, we find that the number of patients screened for eligibility can be divided by 2.7 when broadening eligibility criteria. Last, we find that the Cox-Snell [Formula] is a good approximation of the reduction in sample size requirements provided by covariate adjustment. This metric can be used in the design of time-to-event trials to determine sample size. Overall, more systematic adjustment for prognostic covariates leads to more efficient and inclusive clinical trials especially when cumulative incidence is large as in metastatic and advanced cancers. Key messagesO_LICovariate adjustment is a statistical technique that leverages prognostic scores within the statistical analysis of a trial. We study its benefits for time-to-event trials. C_LIO_LIPower gain achieved with covariate adjustment is determined by the prognostic performance of the covariate and by the cumulative incidence of events at the end of the follow-up period. C_LIO_LITrials in indications with large cumulative incidence such as metastatic cancers can benefit from covariate adjustment to improve their statistical power. C_LIO_LICovariate adjustment maintains statistical power in trials when eligibility criteria are broadened. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.8%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.8%
3
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
4
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
6
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.5%
7
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
9
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
10
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
12
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
19
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
22
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
30
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%