Back

Cooperative cis-interactions between ectodomains of TCRαβ CD3 subunits enable mechanotransduction

Cong, P.; Natarajan, A.; Yuan, Z.; Ge, C.; Travaglino, S.; Beesam, S.; Li, X.; Grazette, D.; Krogsgaard, M.; Zhu, C.

2026-02-11 immunology
10.1101/2022.04.14.488403 bioRxiv
Show abstract

TCR signaling poses a mechanical problem: pMHC binding occurs at the TCR{beta} ectodomain (ECD) head, whereas ITAM phosphorylation occurs on CD3 cytoplasmic tails. Chemistry cannot bridge this >10 nm gap, requiring the two events to be coupled through the TCR-CD3 interface, thus involving conformational allostery and being regulatable by force. Although weak ECD cis-interactions between TCR{beta} and CD3 have been proposed to contribute to this coupling, their kinetics and mechanical competence remain elusive. Here, we quantify TCR{beta}-CD3 ECD cis-interactions in a pseudo-cis configuration using two-dimensional binding and single-bond force spectroscopy, finding that TCR{beta}-CD3{gamma}{varepsilon} and TCR{beta}-CD3{delta}{varepsilon} interactions have low affinity and rapid kinetics, yet form catch bonds. Critically, concurrent engagement of CD3{gamma}{varepsilon} and CD3{delta}{varepsilon} produces high cis-cooperativity, yielding a stronger and longer-lasting CD3{gamma}{varepsilon}-TCR{beta}-CD3{delta}{varepsilon} trimolecular catch bond than the sum of the two dimeric bonds, with force-stabilized lifetimes matching those of agonist TCR-pMHC trans-interaction. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal an expanded, cooperative, and asymmetric contact network, making CD3{delta}{varepsilon} more force-responsive and susceptible to conformational change than CD3{gamma}{varepsilon}. Interface mutations do not alter force-free affinities but remodel cooperative cis-bond profiles, leading to an inverse correlation with trans-bond profiles and T cell signaling. These results identify cooperative ECD cis-interaction as a mechanically regulatable allosteric coupling element at the TCR-CD3 junction important to antigen recognition and signal initiation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.