Effectiveness of Four Vaccines in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Kazakhstan
NABIROVA, D.; Horth, R.; Smagul, M.; Nukenova, G.; Yesmagambetova, A.; Singer, D.; Henderson, A.; Tsoy, A.
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDIn February 2021 Kazakhstan began offering COVID-19 vaccines to adults. Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections raised concerns about real-world vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to evaluate effectiveness of four vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODSWe conducted a retrospective cohort analysis among adults in Almaty using aggregated vaccination data and individual-level breakthrough COVID-19 cases ([≥]14 days from 2nd dose) using national surveillance data. We ran time-adjusted Cox-proportional-hazards model with sensitivity analysis accounting for varying entry into vaccinated cohort to assess vaccine effectiveness for each vaccine (measured as 1-adjusted hazard ratios) using the unvaccinated population as reference (N=565,390). We separately calculated daily cumulative hazards for COVID-19 breakthrough among vaccinated persons by age and vaccine month. RESULTSFrom February 22 to Sept 1, 2021 in Almaty, 747,558 (57%) adults were fully vaccinated (received 2 doses) and 108,324 COVID-19 cases (11,472 breakthrough) were registered. Vaccine effectiveness against infection was 78% (sensitivity estimates: 74-82%) for QazVac, 77% (72- 81%) for Sputnik V, 71% (69-72%) for Hayat-Vax, and 69% (64-72%) for CoronaVac. Among vaccinated persons, the 90-day follow-up cumulative hazard for breakthrough infection was 2.2%. Cumulative hazard was 2.9% among people aged [≥]60 years versus 1.9% among persons aged 18-39 years (p<0.001), and 1.2% for people vaccinated in February-May versus 3.3% in June-August (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONOur analysis demonstrates high effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against infection in Almaty similar to other observational studies. Higher cumulative hazard of breakthrough among people >60 years of age and during variant surges warrants targeted booster vaccination campaigns. What is already known on this topicO_LIPlenty of data are published on effectiveness of mRNA vaccines; however, these vaccines were not widely available in many low- and middle-income countries in 2021. C_LIO_LIThere are no real-world effectiveness studies on several vaccines available in the Central Asia region, including QazVac vaccine, an inactivated vaccine developed by Kazakhstan. C_LIO_LIUnderstanding how these vaccines are performing outside of clinical trials is critical for the COVID-19 response and lack of published data can contribute to vaccine hesitancy. C_LI What this study addsO_LIOur study demonstrated that at the population-level the four vaccines against COVID-19 used in Kazakhstan were effective at preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. C_LIO_LIVaccination reduced the risk of infection by 76% and prevented over 100,000 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Almaty, the countrys most populous city. C_LIO_LIThis is also the first study that demonstrated high vaccine effectiveness in real-world conditions of QazVac, developed in Kazakhstan. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policyO_LIPolicy makers in Kazakhstan and the Central Asia region need data on vaccines provided in the region to update evidence-based vaccine guidelines for different populations. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in an urgent care setting 95%
- Effectiveness of Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine in Zimbabwe used in response to an outbreak among children and young adults: a matched case control study 95%
- Comparative effectiveness of four COVID-19 vaccines, BNT162b2 mRNA, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCov-19 and NVX-CoV2373 against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) infection 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of the WHO-authorized Covid-19 Vaccines: a Rapid Review of Global Reports till June 30, 2021 95%
- Effectiveness of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Corona Virus Vaccine (Covishield™) in preventing SARS-CoV2 infection, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 2021 95%
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529): A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Waning COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness for BNT162b2 and CoronaVac in Malaysia: An Observational Study 95%
- Vaccine effectiveness of primary and booster COVID-19 vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Netherlands from 12 July 2021 to 6 June 2022: a prospective cohort study 95%
- Vaccine effectiveness with BNT162b2 (Comirnaty, Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine against reported SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron infection among adolescents, Norway, August 2021 to January 2022 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefit-Risk Assessment Of COVID-19 Vaccine, Mrna (Mrna-1273) For Males Age 18-64 Years 94%
- Safety and Immunogenicity of CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 Against the SARS-CoV-2 Circulating Variants of Concern (Alpha, Delta, Beta) in Thai Healthcare Workers 94%
- Psychosocial factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the UK: a prospective cohort study (CoVAccS – wave 3) 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.