A Systematic Approach to Identify Neuroprotective Interventions for Motor Neuron Disease
Wong, C.; Gregory, J. M.; Liao, J.; Egan, K.; Vesterinen, H. M.; Selvaraj, B. T.; Chataway, J.; Swingler, R.; Connick, P.; Pal, S.; Chandran, S.; Macleod, M. R.; ReLiSyR-MND Consortium,
Show abstract
BackgroundMotor neuron disease (MND) is an incurable progressive neurodegenerative disease with limited treatment options. There is a pressing need for innovation in identifying therapies to take to clinical trial. ObjectivesHere we detail a systematic, structured, and unbiased evidence-based approach to guide selection of drugs for clinical evaluation in the Motor Neuron Disease - Systematic Multi-arm Adaptive Randomised Trial (MND-SMART, clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT04302870), an adaptive platform trial. MethodsWe conducted a two-stage systematic review and meta-analysis to identify potential neuroprotective interventions. In stage one, we identified drugs from the clinical literature tested in at least one study in MND or in two or more cognate diseases with potential shared pivotal pathways (Alzheimers disease, Huntingtons disease, Parkinsons disease, or multiple sclerosis). We scored and ranked 66 drugs thus identified using a predefined framework evaluating safety, efficacy, study size and quality of studies. In stage two, we conducted a systematic review of the MND preclinical literature describing efficacy of these drugs in animal models, multicellular eukaryotic models and human induced pluripotent stem cell studies; 17 of these drugs were reported to improve survival in at least one preclinical study. An expert panel then shortlisted and ranked 22 drugs considering stage one and stage two findings, mechanistic plausibility, safety and tolerability, findings from previous clinical trials in MND, and feasibility for use in clinical trials. ResultsBased on this process, the panel selected memantine and trazodone for testing in MND-SMART. DiscussionFor future drug selection, we will incorporate automation tools, text-mining and machine learning techniques to the systematic reviews and consider data generated from other domains, including high-throughput phenotypic screening of human induced pluripotent stem cells. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYO_LIWe described a systematic, evidence-based approach towards drug repurposing in motor neuron disease (MND), specifically for Motor Neuron Disease - Systematic Multi-arm Adaptive Randomised Trial (MND-SMART), a phase III multi-arm multi-stage clinical trial in MND. C_LIO_LISystematic reviews of clinical studies in neurodegenerative diseases and MND preclinical studies provided a robust evidence base to inform expert panel decisions on drug selection for clinical trials. C_LIO_LIProviding a contemporary evidence base using traditional systematic reviews is challenging given their time-consuming and labour-intensive nature. C_LIO_LIIncorporation of machine learning and automation tools for systematic reviews, and data from experimental drug screening can be helpful for future drug selection. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Current status and future opportunities in modeling Multiple Sclerosis clinical characteristics 92%
- A Phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prasinezumab in early Parkinson’s disease (PASADENA): rationale, design and baseline data 92%
- A randomized sham-controlled trial of transcranial and intranasal photobiomodulation in Japanese patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia due to Alzhimer’s disease: a protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A low molecular weight dextran sulphate, ILB(R), for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): an open-label, single-arm, single-centre, phase II trial 93%
- Protocol for a seamless phase 2A-phase 2B randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of benfotiamine in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease (BenfoTeam) 92%
- Masitinib Limits Neuronal Damage, as Measured by Serum Neurofilament Light Chain Concentration, in a Model of Neuroimmune-Driven Neurodegenerative Disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nusinersen in adult patients with 5q spinal muscular atrophy: a multicenter observational cohorts’ study 93%
- Diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a (network) meta-analysis 91%
- Antiherpetic medication and incident dementia: observational cohort studies in four countries 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of the Reliability, Responsiveness, and Meaningfulness of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) for Lysosomal Storage Disorders 93%
- Acetyl-L-leucine for Niemann-Pick type C – a multi-national, rater-blinded phase II trial 93%
- The role of age in choosing high-efficacy treatment for multiple sclerosis - an Austrian MS Database study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.