Reproducibility of Survey Measurements of Sexual Orientation in the USA.
Turner, C. F.; Turner, B. A.; Chromy, J. R.
Show abstract
Survey measurements of sexual orientation have become increasingly common in national population surveys although validation of these measurements is rare and inherently problematic. We instead assess the reproducibility of parallel measurements from two independent samples of the USA population made in the 2008-2018 General Social Surveys and the adult probability subsets of the 2013-2018 National Health Interview Survey (Ns = 12,098 and 190,113). Restricting analysis to the categories gay/lesbian, bisexual, and straight, we obtain similar estimates of the proportion of the U.S. population who consider themselves gay/lesbian (NHIS: 1.59% vs. GSS: 1.93%, p = 0.059) but not bisexual (NHIS: 1.03% vs. GSS: 2.90%, p < 0.001). Fitting multinomial logistic regression models controlling for year, gender, birth cohort, education, and race, we find that compared to the NHIS, the GSS had 1.248 (p=0.022) times higher relative odds of eliciting a response of Gay-Lesbian (vs. Straight) and 2.980 (p<0.001) times higher relative odds of eliciting a response of Bisexual (vs. Straight). Expanding the model by adding 3-way interaction terms for orientation-by-predictor-by-survey, we find that we cannot reject the null hypothesis that trends over time and across subpopulations in reporting of sexual orientation were statistically equivalent for the two survey programs.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disparities in self-reported Mental Health, Physical Health, and Substance Use Across Sexual Orientations in Canada 94%
- Autonomy-Supportive Sexual Health Communication and Sexual Health Behaviors for Black and Latino MSM in the House Ball Community: Protocol for a Social Network Analysis and Exploratory Structural Equation Model 94%
- Latent classes of men’s intimate partner violence perpetration and attitudes towards gender norms: a UN multi-country, cross-sectional study in Asia and the Pacific 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Association between Active Membership in Voluntary Organizations and Homonegativity 93%
- Non-Consensual Sex among Japanese Women in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Large-Scale Nationwide Survey-Based Study 91%
- Sociodemographic predictors of outcomes in COVID-19: examining the impact of ethnic disparities in Northern Nevada 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- How did COVID-19 measures impact sexual behaviour and access to HIV/STI services in Panama? Results from a national cross-sectional online survey 93%
- Characterizing HIV and STIs among Transgender Female Sex Workers: A Longitudinal Analysis 92%
- Going beyond regular and casual: development of a classification of sexual partner types to enhance partner notification for sexually transmitted infections, a mixed methods approach 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Yet another lockdown? A large-scale study on people’s unwillingness to be confined during the first 5 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain 90%
- Racial and ethnic disparities for SARS-CoV-2 positivity in the United States: a generalizing pandemic 88%
- Giving birth under hospital visitor restrictions: Heightened acute stress in childbirth in COVID-19 positive women 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.