Poor Working Relationship between Doctors and Hospital Managers: A Systematic Review
Ogbeivor, C.; Ogbeivor, P. E.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe problem of poor relationships between doctors and hospital managers is a common feature of many healthcare systems worldwide, including the United Kingdoms NHS. Despite the significant impact that a poor working relationship between doctors and managers could have on the quality of care, there is limited research in this area. ObjectivesTo investigate the organisational factors, contributing to the poor working relationship between doctors and hospital managers with a view to recommend potential solutions to address them. MethodsWe performed a systematic literature review; a comprehensive search of AMED, MEDLINE, CINAHL, plus with Full Text, SportDiscus and EBSCO EBooks from January 2000 to July 2019 and updated in March 2022, and no further article was found that meets the selection criteria. Mixed methods, qualitative studies and quantitative studies published in English language in peer reviewed journals between January 2000 and March 2022 were included. Study selection, data extraction and appraisal of study were undertaken by the authors. Quality criteria were selected from CASP Checklist. ResultsA total of 49,340 citations were retrieved and screened for eligibility, 41 articles were assessed as full text and 15 met the inclusion criteria. These include 2 mixed method studies, 8 qualitative studies, and 5 quantitative studies. A thematic analysis was undertaken, and narrative summaries used to synthesise the findings. ConclusionThe findings of this systematic review show strong evidence of poor collaboration and lack of effective communication that contribute to poor working relationships between physicians and hospital administrators. The results from this review may guide the development of a hospital plan that involves both doctors and managers in the decision making process regarding the quality of patient care, which could potentially enhance the relationship between the two groups as it would build trust between them. O_TEXTBOXWhat is already known on this topicO_LIThe problem of poor relationships between doctors and hospital managers is a common feature of many healthcare systems worldwide. C_LIO_LIDespite the significant impact this poor relationship could have on the quality of care and patient satisfaction, there is limited research in this area. C_LI What This Study AddsO_LIWe conducted a systematic review on the effect of tension between doctors and hospital managers on the quality of care provided in hospital or healthcare centres; 15 (qualitative, quantitative and mixed) primary papers were reviewed. This qualitative systematic study found considerable evidence of organisational factors that contributes to poor working relationships between doctors and managers. C_LI C_TEXTBOX
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 96%
- Relationship Between Adverse Events Prevalence, Patient Safety Culture And Patient Safety Perception In A Single Sample Of Patients: A Cross-Sectional And Correlational Study 95%
- Occupational challenges of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Patient Safety Curriculum: An Interventional Study on the Effectiveness of Patient Safety Education for Jordanian Nursing Students 95%
- Determinants of regulatory compliance in health and social care services: a systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 94%
- Risk perceptions and preventive practices of COVID-19 among healthcare professionals in public hospitals in Ethiopia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- What has been the impact of Covid-19 on Safety Culture? A case study from a large metropolitan teaching hospital. 93%
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 92%
- Artificial Intelligence Applications for COVID-19 in Intensive Care and Emergency Settings: A Systematic Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 94%
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- Differences in medication reconciliation interventions between six hospitals: a mixed method study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 95%
- Healthcare workers’ perceptions and medically approved COVID-19 infection risk: understanding the mental health dimension of the pandemic. A German hospital case study 91%
- Anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis of the high-income region in China 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.