Back

Lowered oxygen saturation and increased body temperature in acute COVID-19 largely predict chronic fatigue syndrome and affective symptoms due to LONG COVID: a precision nomothetic approach

Al-Hadrawi, D. S.; Al-Rubaye, H. T.; Almulla, A. F.; Al-Hakeim, H. K.; Maes, M. F.

2022-04-12 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2022.04.10.22273660
Show abstract

BackgroundLong coronavirus disease 2019 (LC) is a chronic sequel of acute COVID-19. The exact pathophysiology of the affective, chronic fatigue and physiosomatic symptoms (labeled as "physio-affective phenome") of LC has remained elusive. ObjectiveThe current study aims to delineate the effects of oxygen saturation (SpO2) and body temperature during the acute phase on the physio-affective phenome of LC. MethodWe recruited 120 LC patients and 36 controls. For all participants, we assessed the lowest SpO2 and peak body temperature during acute COVID-19, and the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMD/HAMA) and Fibro Fatigue (FF) scales 3 to 4 months later. ResultsLowered SpO2 and increased body temperature during the acute phase and female sex predict 60.7% of the variance in the physio-affective phenome of LC. Using unsupervised learning techniques we were able to delineate a new endophenotype class, which comprises around 26.7% of the LC patients and is characterized by very low SpO2 and very high body temperature, and depression, anxiety, chronic fatigue, and autonomic and gastro-intestinal symptoms scores. Single latent vectors could be extracted from both biomarkers, depression, anxiety and FF symptoms or from both biomarkers, insomnia, chronic fatigue, gastro-intestinal and autonomic symptoms. ConclusionThe newly constructed endophenotype class and pathway phenotypes indicate that the physio-affective phenome of LC is at least in part the consequence of the pathophysiology of acute COVID-19, namely the combined effects of lowered SpO2, increased body temperature and the associated immune-inflammatory processes and lung lesions.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 7%
13.1%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 50%
10.2%
3
Journal of Affective Disorders
based on 72 papers
Top 2%
7.6%
4
Molecular Psychiatry
based on 84 papers
Top 1%
6.4%
5
Translational Psychiatry
based on 94 papers
Top 3%
6.4%
6
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
5.3%
7
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
based on 35 papers
Top 0.5%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
based on 56 papers
Top 3%
3.0%
9
Psychiatry Research
based on 33 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 22%
2.8%
11
Psychological Medicine
based on 52 papers
Top 4%
2.4%
12
Cells
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
2.3%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 7%
2.3%
14
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 8%
1.9%
15
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 8%
1.6%
16
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 29%
0.8%
17
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
based on 27 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Neuropsychopharmacology
based on 29 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
19
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 14%
0.7%
20
Sleep Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
21
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 9%
0.7%
22
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Biological Psychiatry
based on 36 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
24
BJPsych Open
based on 24 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 12%
0.7%