An observational analysis of patient recruitment in clinical trials in France using real-word database PMSI.French patient recruitment in clinical trials using PMSI
SEANEHIA, J.; LAMPURE, A.; GORDEJUELA, R.; AMDOUNI, B.; MANZIONE, P.; MAMMAS, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundFrance has significant clinical research and development potential, however, struggles in comparison to neighbouring countries. A significant reason is the difficulty to recruit patients, thus causing delays in the availability of new therapies to market. IQVIA uses Health Insurance Claims Data among other data assets, to better locate patients for trials based on the potential of hospitals. ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to monitor whether an increased number of patients enrolled in clinical trials in France was observed when PMSI data supported patient recruitment, as well as describing clinical trial landscape worldwide and in Europe. MethodsWe used data from ClinicalTrials.gov and Citeline to describe the clinical trial landscape in Europe between 2010 and 2019. We also looked at the IQVIA internal clinical trial tracker, Clinical Trial Management System (CTMS) to describe IQVIA-run trials and their performance after matching trials supported with PMSI data in France. We compared the average number of enrolled patients per site in PMSI and non-PMSI supported trials according to the study phase, using a Student t-test. ResultsResults suggest that the support of PMSI on the average number of enrolled patients per site, when comparing at similar trial phase level, shows a positive trend especially for phase 4 studies (11.0 with PMSI vs 9.3 without PMSI, p=0.67), and for phases 3b, 3 and 1, when compared to non-PMSI supported studies. ConclusionsThe findings of this study suggest that PMSI use has the potential to increase patient recruitment into clinical trials run in France, rendering France more attractive in its exploitation of the clinical research potential. Optimising patient recruitment has a direct impact on the availability and timeliness of innovative therapies to market for French patients.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Number of Interventional Clinical Trials Registered per Million Population per Country Worldwide 96%
- Trials that turn from retrospectively registered to prospectively registered: A cohort study of ‘retroactively prospective’ clinical trial registration using history data 95%
- Supporting Reanalysis and Reuse of Clinical Trial Data: A Case Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reporting of Retrospective Registration in Clinical Trial Publications 96%
- Sunshine on KOL : a retrospective study about financial ties between medical key opinion leaders and pharmaceutical industry in France 93%
- An Analysis of Controlled Human Infection Studies Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Results dissemination from clinical trials conducted at German university medical centres was delayed and incomplete 95%
- Results reporting for clinical trials led by medical universities and university hospitals in the Nordic countries was often missing or delayed 95%
- The use of the Registered Reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence Supporting EMA Drug Approvals (2020-2023): A Cross-Sectional Study of Trial Design and Outcomes 92%
- Dynamic methods for ongoing assessment of site-level risk in risk-based monitoring of clinical trials: a scoping review 92%
- Design and implementation of the multi-arm, multi-stage Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19 (TICO) platform master protocol: An Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV) initiative 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring scalable assessment methods for terminated trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: A cohort analysis of German and Californian trials 95%
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 94%
- An interactive retrieval system for clinical trial studies with context-dependent protocol elements 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.