Back

Effectiveness of a nation-wide COVID-19 vaccination program in Mexico

Bello-Chavolla, O. Y.; Antonio-Villa, N. E.; Valdes-Ferrer, S. I.; Fermin-Martinez, C. A.; Fernandez-Chirino, L.; Ramirez-Garcia, D.; Mancilla-Galindo, J.; Kammar-Garcia, A.; Avila-Funes, J. A.; Zuniga-Gil, C. H.; Garcia-Grimshaw, M.; Ceballos-Liceaga, S. E.; Carbajal-Sandoval, G.; Montes-Gonzalez, J. A.; Zaragoza-Jimenez, C. A.; Garcia-Rodriguez, G.; Cortes-Alcala, R.; Reyes-Teran, G.; Lopez-Gatell, H.; Gutierrez-Robledo, L. M.

2022-04-05 public and global health
10.1101/2022.04.04.22273330 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDVaccination has been effective in ameliorating the impact of COVID-19. However, estimation of vaccine effectiveness (VE) is still unavailable for some widely used vaccines and underrepresented groups. Here, we report on the effectiveness of a nation-wide COVID-19 vaccination program in Mexico. METHODSWe used a test-negative design within a national COVID-19 surveillance system to assess VE of the BNT162b2, mRNA-12732, Gam-COVID-Vac, Ad5-nCoV, Ad26.COV2.S, ChAdOx1 and CoronaVac vaccines, against SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 related hospitalization and death for adults [≥]18 years in Mexico. VE was estimated using Cox proportional hazard models considering time-varying vaccination status in partial and fully vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated adults, adjusted by age, sex, comorbidities and municipality. We also estimated VE for adults [≥]60 years, for cases with diabetes and comparing periods with predominance of variants B.1.1.519 and B.1.617.2. RESULTSWe assessed 793,487 vaccinated compared to 4,792,338 unvaccinated adults between December 24th, 2020, and September 27th, 2021. VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection was highest for fully vaccinated individuals with mRNA-12732 (91.5%, 95%CI 90.3-92.4) and Ad26.COV2.S (82.2%, 95%CI 81.4-82.9), whereas for COVID-19 related hospitalization were BNT162b2 (84.3%, 95%CI 83.6-84.9) and Gam-COVID-Vac (81.4% 95%CI 79.5-83.1) and for mortality BNT162b2 (89.8%, 95%CI 89.2-90.2) and mRNA-12732 (93.5%, 95%CI 86.0-97.0). VE for all evaluated vaccines was reduced for adults [≥]60 years, people with diabetes, and in periods of Delta variant predominance. CONCLUSIONSAll evaluated vaccines were effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 related hospitalization and death. Mass vaccination campaigns with multiple vaccine products are feasible and effective to maximize vaccination coverage.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.3%
2
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
5
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.9%
8
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
15
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
20
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%
25
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%