SEN support from the start of school and its impact on unplanned hospital utilisation in children with cleft lip and palate: a demonstration target trial emulation protocol using ECHILD
Nguyen, V.; Zylbersztejn, A.; Harron, K.; Ford, T.; Black-Hawkins, K.; Boddy, K.; Downs, J.; Doyle, M.; Lilliman, M.; Matthews, J.; Logan, S.; Rahi, J.; Gilbert, R.; Dearden, L.; De Stavola, B. L. L.
Show abstract
Special Educational Needs (SEN) provision for school children provides extra support and reasonable adjustments for children and young people with additional educational, behavioural or health needs to ensure equal education opportunities; for example those born with a healthcare need such as cleft lip and palate may be provided SEN to aid with challenges in communications. However, there is limited knowledge of whether SEN provisions impact academic or health outcomes in such a population and conducting a randomised controlled trial to establish this evidence is not plausible. In lieu of randomised controlled trials, target trial emulation methods can be used in attempt to answer causal questions using observational data whilst reducing confounding and other biases likely to arise with such data. The Education and Child Health Insights from Linked Data (ECHILD) dataset could be used as part of trial emulation methods to understand the impact of SEN provisions on academic and healthcare outcomes. ECHILD is the first dataset to hold longitudinal school, health and social care data on all pupils in England, obtained by linking the National Pupil Database (NPD) with Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). In this protocol, we describe how the ECHILD dataset could be used to explore and conduct a target trial emulation to evaluate whether children who were born with cleft lip and palate would have different unplanned hospital utilisation if they received or did not receive SEN provisions by Year 1 (specifically by January in their second year of school) when they are aged 5 or 6. MethodsFocussing on the population of children who are identified as having been born with cleft lip and palate, an intervention of varying levels of SEN provision (including no SEN provision) by January of the second year of school, and an outcome of unplanned hospital utilisation, we apply a trial emulation design to reduce confounding when using observational data to investigate the causal impact of SEN on unplanned hospital admissions. Our target population is children born 2001-2014 who had a recording of cleft lip and palate in HES and who started their second year of primary school (Year 1) in a state school between 2006 and 2019; children with a first recording of cleft lip and palate after Year 1 were excluded (these were pupils who likely immigrated to England after birth). We intend to use a time window of SEN provision assignment between the start of school (reception) and by the January school census in Year 1. Using target trial emulation, we aim to estimate the average treatment effect of SEN provision on the number of unplanned hospital admissions (including admissions to accident and emergency) between the January school census in Year 1 and Year 6 (the end of primary school, when children are 10-11 years old). Ethics and disseminationPermissions to use linked, de-identified data from Hospital Episode Statistics and the National Public Database were granted by DfE (DR200604.02B) and NHS Digital (DARS-NIC-381972). Ethical approval for the ECHILD project was granted by the National Research Ethics Service (17/LO/1494), NHS Health Research Authority Research Ethics Committee (20/EE/0180) and UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Healths Joint Research and Development Office (20PE06). Stakeholders (academics, clinicians, educators and child/young people advocacy groups) will consistently be consulted to refine populations, interventions and outcomes of studies that use the ECHILD dataset to conduct target trial emulation. Scientific, lay and policy briefings will be produced to inform public health policy through partners in the Department of Education and the Department of Health and Social Care.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in neural tube defects in Scotland 2000-2021 prior to the introduction of mandatory folic acid fortification of non-wholemeal wheat flour: a population-based study 90%
- Deficits in planned hospital care for vulnerable adolescents in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of linked administrative data 89%
- Indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric health-care use and severe disease: a retrospective national cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scalable Transdiagnostic Early Assessment of Mental health (STREAM): Study Protocol 92%
- The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings 91%
- Effect of covid-19 lockdown on child protection medical assessments: a retrospective observational study in Birmingham, UK. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of SARS-CoV-2 testing, PCR-confirmed infections and COVID-19--related hospital admissions in children and young people: birth cohort study 89%
- Staff-Pupil SARS-CoV-2 Infection Pathways in Schools: A Population Level Linked Data Approach 88%
- Influence of vitamin D supplementation on growth, body composition, pubertal development and spirometry in South African schoolchildren: a randomised controlled trial (ViDiKids) 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole population cohorts versus sampled comparators designs for evaluating health and educational outcomes of children with inborn rare conditions: a simulation study 91%
- Information bias of vaccine effectiveness estimation due to informed consent for national registration of COVID-19 vaccination: estimation and correction using a data augmentation model 88%
- Estimating and Testing an Index of Bias Attributable to Composite Outcomes in Comparative Studies 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of changing smoking habits and smoke-free legislation on orofacial cleft incidence in the United Kingdom: evidence from two time-series studies 93%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 91%
- Factors associated with low school readiness, a linked health and education data study in Wales, UK 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.