Size of societal volunteering predicts COVID-19 mortality
Schiltz, F.; Van Remoortel, H.; Scheers, H.; Vandekerckhove, P.
Show abstract
IntroductionDifferent countries responded differently to the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of timing and stringency of measures, and in types of policies adopted. Typically, policy makers tried to balance the capacity of healthcare systems to take care of the ill (as determined by ICU capacity, availability of nurses, etc.), with safeguarding economic output (preventing total lockdown of the labor force, etc.). Later on, also a broader array of considerations such as impact on schooling or the need for social contact were taken into account to varying degrees. The broad and relatively fast availability of data on healthcare and economic capacity, together with the political estimate that these were the most critical determinants for maintaining societal structure and compliance with the measures taken, in many countries prioritized decision-making. What received far less attention, in part due to the difficulty of obtaining reliable data in a timely manner, was the opposite question: to what extent do societal structures - besides healthcare and economic systems - contribute to a countrys resilience during catastrophes such as the pandemic? While it is commonly understood that the impact of a pandemic goes beyond its death count, perhaps the death count itself is impacted by the way societies are structured. One example of such societal structure is the contribution of volunteers during the COVID-19 response. Volunteers may contribute to well-functioning societies in different ways, both through practical actions (e.g. knitting face masks) as by strengthening societal cohesion (e.g. encouraging fellow citizens to comply with measures). This paper quantifies the association between COVID-19 mortality and the size of societal volunteering, using the unique context of the COVID-19 crisis with its intensity, sudden onset and global spread.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the ‘ Bolsonaro effect ’ on the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic: an empirical analysis of observational data in Brazil 94%
- Public participation in crisis policymaking. How 30,000 Dutch citizens advised their government on relaxing COVID-19 lockdown measures 93%
- The impact of COVID-19 employment shocks on suicide and safety net use: An early-stage investigation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prospective cohort study of socioeconomic status and subsequent unemployment under COVID-19 in Japan 93%
- Social Class, Race/Ethnicity, and COVID-19 Mortality Among Working Age Adults in the United States 92%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Words Matter: Political and gender analysis of speeches made by heads of government during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- Daughter circumcision and maternal life satisfaction: A cultural moderation effect revealed across two studies 92%
- The Indian Civil Registration System: a potentially viable data source for reliable subnational mortality measurement 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond Deaths per Capita: Comparative CoViD-19 Mortality Indicators 94%
- Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and public health measures: results from an anonymous online survey in Thailand, Malaysia, the United Kingdom, Italy and Slovenia 93%
- Social, Financial and Psychological Stress during an Emerging Pandemic: Observations from a Population Web-Based Survey in the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.