Formative usability assessment of a new connector design for peritoneal dialysis
Yekinni, I. O.; Viker, T.; Hartsig, B.; Erdman, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThis paper presents a first, formative study to explore the usability of a new peritoneal dialysis connector design intended for use by patients. The study was conducted with a user population of both naive users and experienced peritoneal dialysis patients across a range of ages. The goals of the study were to evaluate the usability of the key user interfaces of this connector design by test participants representative of new and experienced peritoneal dialysis patients, as well as to evaluate the use of the connector as it interacts with other components of the peritoneal dialysis system including peritoneal dialysis fluid bags and tubing. Further objectives were to capture any usability issues and obtain participants feedback on the design. MethodsA total of 7 patient and non-patient participants received brief training and performed simulated connection and disconnection of peritoneal catheter extension sets for therapy with the new design. ResultsAll 7 participants completed the simulated connection and disconnection tasks successfully, with only one use error (0.22%), 18 close calls (4.0%), 6 use difficulties (1.3%) observed from the total of 449 use steps performed by all participants. Other findings include usability improvement with repeated use, participants feedback and suggestions for the protective enclosure, a novel feature of the touchless connector design. ConclusionThe studied connector design showed minimal use errors or difficulties and based on participant feedback, the usability can be significantly improved with minimal modifications in future prototypes.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- What do blind people "see" with retinal prostheses? Observations and qualitative reports of epiretinal implant users 95%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 93%
- Use of patient centred outcomes measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: a mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad Tools 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 94%
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 93%
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions 92%
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 90%
- A Novel Maxillofacial Technology for Drug Administration-A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Metronidazole. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Living with rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Victoria, Australia: a qualitative study 90%
- Stakeholders Perspective of Integrating Female Genital Schistosomiasis into HIV Care: A Qualitative Study in Ghana 88%
- Health professionals over estimation of knowledge on snakebite management, a threat to survival of snake bite victims - A cross-sectional study in Ghana. 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital applications to support self-management of multimorbidity: A scoping review 90%
- Machine Learning Directed Interventions Associate with Decreased Hospitalization Rates in Hemodialysis Patients 90%
- Development and Evaluation of MADDIE: Method to Acquire Delivery Date Information from Electronic Health Records 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.