The Evolution of Protein Folds by Creative Destruction
Alvarez-Carreno, C.; Gupta, R. J.; Petrov, A. S.; Williams, L. D.
Show abstract
Mechanisms by which new protein folds emerge and diverge pose central questions in biological sciences. Incremental mutation and step-wise adaptation explain relationships between topologically similar protein folds. However, the universe of folds is diverse and riotous, suggesting roles of more potent and creative forces. Sequence and structure similarity are observed between topologically distinct folds, indicating that proteins with distinct folds may share common ancestry. We found evidence of common ancestry between three distinct {beta}-barrel folds: OB, SH3 and cradle loop barrel (CLB). The data suggest a mechanism of fold evolution that interconverts SH3, OB and CLB. This mechanism, which we call creative destruction, can be generalized to explain other examples of fold evolution including circular permutation. In creative destruction, an open reading frame duplicates or otherwise merges with another to produce a fused polypeptide. A merger forces two ancestral domains into a new sequence and spatial context. The fused polypeptide can explore folding landscapes that are inaccessible to either of the independent ancestral domains. However, the folding landscapes of the fused polypeptide are not fully independent of those of the ancestral domains. Creative destruction is thus partially conservative in that a daughter fold would inherit some motifs from the ancestral folds. After a merger and refolding, adaptive processes such as mutation and loss of extraneous segments optimize the new daughter fold. SignificanceMechanisms of emergence and early diversification of structured proteins present deep and difficult problems in evolutionary biology. Here we excavate the deepest evolutionary history, found within the translation machinery, which is an ancient molecular fossil and the birthplace of all proteins. We demonstrate common origins of some of the simplest, oldest and most common protein folds. Furthermore, the data suggest a mechanism, that we call creative destruction, that explains at molecular level how simple folds spawn more complex folds. In this mechanism, new folds emerge from old folds via gene duplication, expression, exploration of new folding landscapes and adaptation. Creative destruction explains the facile emergence of complex from simple architectures in a funneled exploration.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep evolutionary analysis reveals the design principles of fold A glycosyltransferases 96%
- A complex IRES at the 5'-UTR of a viral mRNA assembles a functional 48S complex via an uAUG intermediate. 95%
- Structural insights into mRNA reading frame regulation by tRNA modification and slippery codon-anticodon pairing 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common evolutionary origins of the bacterial glycyl tRNA synthetase and alanyl tRNA synthetase 97%
- Predicted structure of the hepatitis B virus polymerase reveals an ancient conserved protein fold 95%
- Crystal structure and molecular dynamics of human POLDIP2, a multifaceted adaptor protein in metabolism and genome stability 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular and structural basis of a subfamily of PrfH rescuing both the damaged and intact ribosomes stalled in translation 95%
- A viral genome packaging motor transitions between cyclic and helical symmetry to translocate dsDNA 95%
- The SARS-CoV-2 Spike Variant D614G Favors an Open Conformational State 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.