Back

Using DeepLabCut for tracking body landmarks in videos of children with dyskinetic cerebral palsy: a working methodology

Haberfehlner, H.; van de Ven, S. S.; van der Burg, S. A.; Aleo, I.; Bonouvrie, L. A.; Harlaar, J.; Buizer, A. I.; van der Krogt, M. M.

2022-04-02 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2022.03.30.22272088 medRxiv
Show abstract

Markerless motion tracking is a promising technique to capture human movements and postures. It could be a clinically feasible tool to objectively assess movement disorders within severe dyskinetic cerebral palsy (CP). Here, we aim to evaluate tracking accuracy on clinically recorded video data. Method94 video recordings of 33 participants (dyskinetic CP, 8-23 years; GMFCS IV-V, i.e. non-ambulatory) from a previous clinical trial were used. Twenty-second clips were cut during lying down as this is a postion for this group of children and young adults allows to freely move. Video image resolution was 0.4 cm per pixel. Tracking was performed in DeepLabCut. We evaluated a model that was pre-trained on a human healthy adult data set with an increasing number of manually labeled frames (0, 1, 2, 6, 10, 15 and 20 frames per video). To assess generalizability, we used 80% of videos for the model development and evaluated the generalizability of the model using the remaining 20%. For evaluation the mean absolute error (MAE) between DeepLabCuts prediction of the position of body points and manual labels was calculated. ResultsUsing just the pre-trained adult human model yielded a MAE of 121 pixels. An MAE of 4.5 pixels (about 1.5 cm) could be achieved by adding 15-20 manual labels. When applied to unseen video clips (i.e. generalization set), the MAE was 33 pixels with a dedicated model trained on 20 frames per videos. ConclusionAccuracy of tracking with a standard pre-trained model is insufficiently to automatically assess movement disorders in dyskinetic CP. However, manually adding labels improves the model performance substantially. In addition, the methodology proposed within our study is applicable to check the accuracy of DeepLabCut application within other clinical data set.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.