Memory reactivation in slow wave sleep enhances relational learning
Santamaria, L.; Kashif, I.; McGinley, N.; Lewis, P.
Show abstract
Sleep has been shown to boost the integration of memories, and thus to facilitate relational learning. This benefit is thought to rely upon memory reactivation during non-REM sleep. We set out to test this possibility by explicitly cueing such reactivation using a technique called targeted memory reactivation (TMR), in which sounds are paired with learned material in wake and then softly played back to the participant in sleep, triggering reactivation of the associated memories. Specifically, we tested whether TMR during slow wave sleep leads to enhancements in inferential thinking in a transitive inference task. Because the Up-phase of the slow oscillation is more responsive to external cues than the Down-phase, we also asked whether stimulation at this specific phase is more beneficial for such integration. Our data show that Up-phase TMR boosts the ability to make inferences, but only for the most distant inferential leaps. Such stimulation was also associated with detectable memory reinstatement, whereas Down-phase stimulation produced no such trace and led to below-chance performance. These findings demonstrate that cueing memory reactivation at the right time points in sleep can provide a direct benefit to difficult relational learning problems. Significance StatementMemory reactivation in sleep is thought to be important for integrative thinking. We examined this by explicitly cueing reactivation of a transitive inference task during slow wave sleep using Targeted Memory Reactivation (TMR). Because TMR at different phases of the slow oscillation has different impacts, we cued different hierarchies at Up and Down phases. Up-phase TMR enhanced inferential performance and was associated with classifiable memory reactivation. Conversely, Down-phase TMR lead to a short-term impairment in inferential thinking and no detectable reactivation. These findings provide the first evidence that TMR can boost transitive inference and is thus important for integration and reasoning.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disentangling the Functional Roles of Pre-Stimulus Oscillations in Crossmodal Associative Memory Formation via Sensory Entrainment 96%
- High intensity exercise before sleep boosts memory encoding the next morning 95%
- Splitting sleep between the night and a daytime nap reduces homeostatic sleep pressure and enhances long-term memory 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Sleep spindles preferentially consolidate weakly encoded memories 95%
- Mind Wandering During Implicit Learning Is Associated With Increased Periodic Eeg Activity And Improved Extraction Of Hidden Probabilistic Patterns 95%
- Slow oscillation-spindle coupling predicts sequence-based language learning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual differences in information processing during sleep and wake predict sleep-based memory consolidation of complex rules 96%
- Using EEG Microstates to Examine Post-Encoding Quiet Rest and Subsequent Word-Pair Memory 95%
- Sleep Enhances Neural Representations of True and False Memories: An Event-Related Potential Study 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.