Estimating epidemiological quantities from repeated cross-sectional prevalence measurements
Abbott, S.; Funk, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundRepeated measurements of cross-sectional prevalence of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) positivity or seropositivity provide rich insight into the dynamics of an infection. The UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) Community Infection Survey publishes such measurements for SARS-CoV-2 on a weekly basis based on testing enrolled households, contributing to situational awareness in the country. Here we present estimates of time-varying and static epidemiological quantities that were derived from the estimates published by ONS. MethodsWe used a gaussian process to model incidence of infections and then estimated observed PCR prevalence by convolving our modelled incidence estimates with a previously published PCR detection curve describing the probability of a positive test as a function of the time since infection. We refined our incidence estimates using time-varying estimates of antibody prevalence combined with a model of antibody positivity and waning that moved individuals between compartments with or without antibodies based on estimates of new infections, vaccination, probability of seroconversion and waning. ResultsWe produced incidence curves of infection describing the UK epidemic from late April 2020 until early 2022. We used these estimates of incidence to estimate the time-varying growth rate of infections, and combined them with estimates of the generation interval to estimate time-varying reproduction numbers. Biological parameters describing seroconversion and waning, while based on a simple model, were broadly in line with plausible ranges from individual-level studies. ConclusionsBeyond informing situational awareness and allowing for estimates using individual-level data, repeated cross-sectional studies make it possible to estimate epidemiological parameters from population-level models. Studies or public health surveillance methods based on similar designs offer opportunities for further improving our understanding of the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 or other pathogens and their interaction with population-level immunity.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Appropriately smoothing prevalence data to inform estimates of growth rate and reproduction number 94%
- Estimating the generation time for influenza transmission using household data in the United States 93%
- Using next generation matrices to estimate the proportion of cases that are not detected in an outbreak 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian modelling of repeated cross-sectional epidemic prevalence survey data 94%
- Why are different estimates of the effective reproductive number so different? A case study on COVID-19 in Germany 94%
- Efficient modelling of infectious diseases in wildlife: a case study of bovine tuberculosis in wild badgers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling pooling strategies for SARS-CoV-2 testing in a university setting 91%
- Estimating required lockdown cycles before immunity to SARS-CoV-2: Model-based analyses of susceptible population sizes, S0, in seven European countries including the UK and Ireland 90%
- Baseline nowcasting methods for handling delays in epidemiological data 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 during periods of high, low and zero case incidence 93%
- Selection for infectivity profiles in slow and fast epidemics, and the rise of SARS-CoV-2 variants 93%
- Revealing the drivers of antibiotic resistance trends in Streptococcus pneumoniae amidst the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from mathematical modeling 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.