Back

Estimating epidemiological quantities from repeated cross-sectional prevalence measurements

Abbott, S.; Funk, S.

2022-04-02 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.03.29.22273101 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRepeated measurements of cross-sectional prevalence of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) positivity or seropositivity provide rich insight into the dynamics of an infection. The UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) Community Infection Survey publishes such measurements for SARS-CoV-2 on a weekly basis based on testing enrolled households, contributing to situational awareness in the country. Here we present estimates of time-varying and static epidemiological quantities that were derived from the estimates published by ONS. MethodsWe used a gaussian process to model incidence of infections and then estimated observed PCR prevalence by convolving our modelled incidence estimates with a previously published PCR detection curve describing the probability of a positive test as a function of the time since infection. We refined our incidence estimates using time-varying estimates of antibody prevalence combined with a model of antibody positivity and waning that moved individuals between compartments with or without antibodies based on estimates of new infections, vaccination, probability of seroconversion and waning. ResultsWe produced incidence curves of infection describing the UK epidemic from late April 2020 until early 2022. We used these estimates of incidence to estimate the time-varying growth rate of infections, and combined them with estimates of the generation interval to estimate time-varying reproduction numbers. Biological parameters describing seroconversion and waning, while based on a simple model, were broadly in line with plausible ranges from individual-level studies. ConclusionsBeyond informing situational awareness and allowing for estimates using individual-level data, repeated cross-sectional studies make it possible to estimate epidemiological parameters from population-level models. Studies or public health surveillance methods based on similar designs offer opportunities for further improving our understanding of the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 or other pathogens and their interaction with population-level immunity.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
50.2%
50% of probability mass above
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.6%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.5%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
5
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
7
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
8
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.6%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.6%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
15
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
17
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
20
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%