Back

Profiling the proximal proteome of the mu opioid receptor identifies novel regulators of receptor signaling and trafficking

Polacco, B. J.; Lobingier, B. T.; Blythe, E. E.; Abreu, N.; Khare, P.; Howard, M. K.; Gonzalez-Hernandez, A. J.; Xu, J.; Li, Q.; Novy, B.; Naing, Z. Z. C.; Shoichet, B. K.; Coyote-Maestas, W.; Levitz, J.; Krogan, N. J.; Von Zastrow, M.; Huttenhain, R.

2023-12-10 systems biology
10.1101/2022.03.28.486115 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mu opioid receptor (OR), a prototypic member of the large G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, represents an important target of therapeutic and abused drugs. To date, most of our understanding of OR activity has focused on signal transducers and regulatory molecules including G proteins, GPCR kinases, and beta-arrestins. Yet it is clear that signaling through the OR is coordinated by additional proteins recruited into the proximal interaction network of the activated receptor, which have largely remained invisible given the lack of technologies to interrogate these networks systematically. Here, we implement a quantitative proteomics pipeline leveraging the chemical diversity of OR agonists and APEX-based proximity labeling to investigate the protein networks that underlie OR signaling. We leverage a novel computational framework to extract subcellular location, trafficking, and functional partners of GPCR activity from the proximity labeling datasets. Applying this unbiased, systematic approach to the OR, we demonstrate that opioid agonists exert differences in the OR proximal proteome mediated by endocytosis and subsequent endosomal sorting, exemplified by VPS35 and COMMD3. Moreover, we identify two novel OR network components, EYA4 and KCTD12, that are recruited into the receptor proximal network irrespective of the activating ligand and independent of receptor trafficking but based on receptor-triggered G protein activation. We provide functional evidence that these network components form a previously unrecognized buffering system for G protein activity which broadly modulates cellular GPCR signaling.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.