Action sequence dynamics rely on accessory hyperdirect pathway-related targets in the striatum
Ferguson, L. A.; Matamales, M.; Balleine, B. W.; Bertran-Gonzalez, J.
Show abstract
Performing several actions in swift succession is often necessary to exploit known contingencies in the environment. However, in order to remain successful when contingency rules change, streamlined action sequences must be adaptable. Here, by combining analyses of behavioural microstructure with circuit-specific manipulation in mice, we report on a relationship between action timing variability and successful adaptation that relies on post-synaptic targets of primary motor cortical (M1) projections to dorsolateral striatum (DLS). Using a two-lever instrumental task, we found that mice build successful action sequences by first establishing action scaffolds, from which they dynamically elongate as task requirements extend. Specific interruption of the M1[->]DLS circuit altered these dynamics, prompting actions that were less variable in their timing, overall reducing opportunities for success. Our results reveal a role for M1[->]DLS circuitry in setting the exploration/exploitation balance that is required for adaptively guiding the timing and success of instrumental action. Based on evidence from transsynaptic tracing experiments, we propose that such function may involve additional downstream subcortical processing relating to collateralisation of descending motor pathways to multiple basal ganglia centres.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reward integration in prefrontal-cortical and ventral-hippocampal nucleus accumbens inputs cooperatively modulates engagement 97%
- A hippocampus-accumbens code guides goal-directed appetitive behavior 96%
- Continuous multiplexed population representations of task context in the mouse primary visual cortex 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.