Back

Stairway visual contrast enhancement to reduce fall-related events

Harper, S. A.; Long, C.; Corbridge, S.; Barrett, T. S.; Braeger, A.; Zollinger, B. J.; Hale, A. E.; Brown, C. B.; Harrison, K.; Poulsen, S. L.; Boman, T.; Dakin, C. J.

2022-03-25 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2022.03.25.22271716 medRxiv
Show abstract

Falls on stairs occur frequently and pose a significant health and financial risk. Laboratory research has found that fall frequency can be reduced through contrast enhancement of the stairs by applying vinyl striping to the first and last steps faces, and all the steps top edges. Here we sought to determine if such step contrast enhancement can reduce the probability of fall-related events such as loss of balance, slips, trips, and falls in public university staircases. Cameras were used to capture stair users ascent and descent on contrast enhanced ( striped) and control stairways. Observed age group, observed gender, traverse direction (ascent, descent), fall-related events, and walking speed (m/s) were recorded. Fall-related events were reduced for the striped stairway compared to the control stairway (odds ratio = 2.87, average marginal effect = 0.002, p = .023) when controlling for observed gender, age category, and traverse direction. These results suggest contrast enhancement of first and last steps face and all steps edges may reduce fall- related events in public settings. Adding contrast enhancement to public stairways is a simple and cost-effective way to reduce the loss of balance, slips, and trips that could lead to catastrophic falls on stairs as well as the health and financial burden associated with such falls. PRECISContrast enhancement of stairway features may be a simple and cost-effective way to reduce falls on stairs. We show that monochrome striping on the first and last steps faces and black stripes on steps top edges reduce the probability of fall-related events in public stairways.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.