Modeling phytoplankton-zooplankton interactions: opportunities for species richness and challenges for modern coexistence theory
Spaak, J. W.; Adler, P.; Ellner, S.
Show abstract
Many potential mechanisms can sustain biodiversity, but we know little about their relative importance. To compare multiple mechanisms, we modeled a two-trophic planktonic food-web based on mechanistic species interactions and empirically measured species traits. We simulated thousands of communities under realistic and altered trait distributions to assess the relative importance of three potential drivers of species richness: resource competition, predator-prey interactions, and trait trade-offs. Next, we computed niche and fitness differences of competing zooplankton to obtain a deeper understanding of how these mechanisms limit species richness. We found that predator-prey interactions were the most important driver of species richness and that fitness differences were a better predictor of species richness than niche differences. However, for many communities we could not apply modern coexistence theory to compute niche and fitness differences due to complications arising from trophic interactions. We therefore need to expand modern coexistence theory to investigate multi-trophic communities.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Density dependence promotes species coexistence and provides a unifying explanation for distinct productivity-diversity relationships 96%
- Intuitive and broadly applicable definitions of niche and fitness differences 96%
- How community adaptation affects biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Metacommunity dynamics and the detection of species associations in co-occurrence analyses: why patch disturbance matters 94%
- Competition for food affects the strength of reproductive interference and its consequences for species coexistence. 94%
- From apparent competition to facilitation, impacts of consumer niche construction on the coexistence and stability of consumer-resource communities. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.