T1/T2 Ratio Imaging Improves Cortical Lesion Contrast in Multiple Sclerosis on 3T MRI
Manning, A. R.; Beck, E. S.; Schindler, M. K.; Nair, G.; Parvathaneni, P.; Reich, D. S.; Shinohara, R. T.; Solomon, A. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundCortical demyelinated lesions are prevalent in multiple sclerosis (MS) and associated with disability; their presence on MRI has recently been incorporated into MS diagnostic criteria. Presently, advanced and ultra-high-field MRI -- not routinely available in clinical practice -- are the most sensitive methods for detection of cortical lesions, and approaches utilizing MRI sequences obtainable in routine clinical practice remain an unmet need. ObjectiveTo assess the sensitivity of the ratio of T1-weighted and T2-weighted (T1/T2) signal intensity for focal cortical lesions in comparison to other established, sensitive, advanced and high-field imaging methods. Methods3-tesla (3T) and 7-tesla (7T) MRI collected from 10 adults with MS participating in a natural history study at the National Institutes of Health were included in the study. T1/T2 images were calculated by dividing 3T T1w images by 3T T2w fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images for each participant. Cortical lesions were identified using 7T T2*w and T1w images and corresponding voxels were assessed on registered 3T images. For each participant, ratios derived from the median signal intensity of nonlesional tissue in the cortical region of the lesion and the median lesional voxel intensity were computed. These values were compared across 3T imaging sequences, including the calculated T1/T2 image, as well as T1w, T2w, and Inversion Recovery Susceptibility Weighted Imaging with Enhanced T2 weighting (IR-SWIET) images. Results614 cortical lesions were identified on 7T images. 3T T1/T2 images demonstrated a larger contrast between median nonlesional cortical signal intensity and median cortical lesion signal intensity (median ratio = 1.29, range 1.19 - 1.38) when compared to T1w (1.01, 0.97 - 1.10, p<0.002), T2w (1.17, 1.07 - 1.26, p<0.002), and IR-SWIET (1.21, 1.01 - 1.29, p<0.03). ConclusionT1/T2 images are sensitive to cortical lesions. Approaches incorporating T1/T2 could improve the accessibility of cortical lesion detection in research settings and clinical practice.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tissue damage detected by quantitative gradient echo MRI correlates with clinical progression in non-relapsing progressive MS 97%
- Glymphatic dysfunction in multiple sclerosis and its association with disease pathology and disability 97%
- Paramagnetic rim lesions are associated with pathogenic CSF profiles and worse clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective cross-sectional study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Portable, Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sensitively Detects and Accurately Quantifies Multiple Sclerosis Lesions 97%
- Magnetisation transfer, diffusion and g-ratio measures of demyelination and neurodegeneration in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal microstructural MRI study 96%
- Fully Automated Detection of Paramagnetic Rims in Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on 3T Susceptibility-Based MR Imaging 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Linking cortical lesions to metabolic changes in multiple sclerosis using 7T proton MR spectroscopy 96%
- Boston criteria v2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy without hemorrhage: An MRI-neuropathological validation study 94%
- White matter microstructural changes in adult-onset idiopathic focal cervical dystonia using ultra-strong diffusion gradient MRI 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain microstructural changes and fatigue after COVID-19 95%
- LesionQuant for assessment of MRI in multiple sclerosis - a promising supplement to the visual scan inspection 95%
- Longitudinal Assessment of Glymphatic Changes Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Insights from PVS burden and DTI-ALPS Imaging 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.