Back

The genomics and physiology of abiotic stressors associated with global elevation gradients in Arabidopsis thaliana

Gamba, D.; Lorts, C.; Haile, A.; Sahay, S.; Lopez, L.; Xia, T.; Kulesza, E.; Elango, D.; Kerby, J.; Yifru, M.; Bulafu, C. E.; Wondimu, T.; Glowacka, K.; Lasky, J.

2022-03-25 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2022.03.22.485410 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phenotypic and genetic diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana may be associated with adaptation along its wide elevational range. We took a multi-regional view of elevational adaptation and in a diverse panel of ecotypes measured plant responses to high elevation stressors: low partial CO2 pressure, high light, and night freezing. We conducted genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and found evidence of contrasting locally adaptive clines between regions. Western Mediterranean ecotypes showed low {delta}13C/early flowering at low elevations to high {delta}13C/late flowering at high elevations, while Asian ecotypes showed the opposite pattern. We mapped different candidate genes for each region, and trait-associated SNPs often showed elevational clines likely maintained by selection. Antioxidants and pigmentation showed regional differentiation but rarely elevational clines. GWAS for antioxidants identified an ascorbate transporter PHT4;4 (AT4G00370), which we show alters non-photochemical quenching kinetics under high light and may be involved in local adaptation to Moroccan mountains. The low-antioxidant PHT4;4 GWAS allele was associated with lower PHT4;4 expression and this haplotype was characterized by binding sites of a transcription factor family, DOF, involved in light response. Our results highlight how physiological and genomic elevational clines in different regions can be unique, underlining the complexity of local adaptation in widely distributed species.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.