Back

Why is the average collateral effect of synonymous mutations so similar across alternative reading frames?

Wichmann, S.; Ardern, Z.

2022-03-25 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2022.03.22.485379 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The standard genetic code has been shown to have multiple interesting properties which impact on molecular biology and the evolutionary process. One facet of molecular biology where code structure is particularly important is the origin and evolution of overlapping genes. We have previously reported that the structure of the standard genetic code ensures that synonymous mutations in a protein coding gene will lead to a remarkably similar average "collateral" mutation effect size in at least four out of the five alternative reading frames. Here we show that only 0.26% of alternative codes with the block structure of the standard genetic code perform at least as well as the standard code in this property. Considering this finding within a code optimality framework suggests that this consistent effect size across the different frames may be adaptive. Here we give context for this finding and present a simple model where a trade-off between evolvability and robustness leads to an average mutation effect size which maximises population fitness. This supports the intuition that similar mutation effects across the different alternative reading frames may be an adaptive property of the standard genetic code which facilitates evolvability through the use of alternative reading frames.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.5%
2
Journal of Molecular Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
3
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
15.1%
4
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
8
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
13
Biosystems
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
15
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
20
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Virus Evolution
155 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Theoretical Population Biology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
25
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.8%
28
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.8%
29
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
RNA
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%