MRSCloud: a Cloud-based MR Spectroscopy Tool for Basis Set Simulation
Hui, S. C. N.; Saleh, M.; Zoellner, H. J.; Oeltzschner, G.; Fan, H.; Li, Y.; Song, Y.; Jiang, H.; Near, J.; Lu, H.; Mori, S.; Edden, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccurate quantification of in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectra involves modeling with a linear combination of known metabolite basis functions. Basis sets can be generated by numerical simulation using the quantum mechanical density-matrix formalism. Accurate simulations for a basis set require correct sequence timings, and pulse shapes and durations. PurposeTo present a cloud-based spectral simulation tool MRSCloud. It allows community users of MRS to simulate a vendor- and sequence-specific basis set online in a convenient and timeefficient manner. This tool can simulate basis sets for 3 major MR scanner vendors (GE, Philips, Siemens), including conventional acquisitions and spectral editing schemes (MEGA, HERMES, HERCULES) with PRESS and semi-LASER localization. Study TypeProspective. SpecimenN/A Field Strength/SequenceSimulations of 3T basis sets for conventional and spectral-editing sequences (MEGA, HERMES, HERCULES) with PRESS and sLASER localizations. AssessmentSimulated metabolite basis functions generated by MRSCloud are compared to those generated by FID-A and MARSS, and a phantom-acquired basis-set from LCModel. Statistical TestsIntraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to measure the agreement between individual metabolite basis functions generated using different packages. Statistical analysis was performed using R in RStudio. ResultsSimulation time for a full basis set is approximately 1 hour. ICCs between MRSCloud and FID-A were at least 0.98 and ICCs between MRSCloud and MARSS were at least 0.96. ICCs between simulated MRSCloud basis spectra and acquired LCModel basis spectra were lowest for Gln at 0.68 and highest for NAA at 0.96. Data ConclusionSubstantial reductions in runtime have been achieved by implementing the 1D projection method, coherence-order filtering, and pre-calculation of propagators. High ICC values indicated that the accelerating features are running correctly and produce comparable and accurate basis sets. The generated basis set has been successfully used with LCModel.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- GABA quantification in human anterior cingulate cortex 94%
- Acceleration of chemical shift encoding-based water fat MRI for liver proton density fat fraction and T2* mapping using compressed sensing 93%
- Freewater EstimatoR using iNtErpolated iniTialization (FERNET): Toward Accurate Estimation of Free Water in Peritumoral Region Using Single-Shell Diffusion MRI Data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased Sensitivity and Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Diffusion-Weighted MRI using Multi-Echo Acquisitions 94%
- Quantitative T1-relaxation corrected metabolite mapping of 12 metabolites in the human brain at 9.4 T 94%
- High-Resolution Magnetization-Transfer Imaging of Post-Mortem Marmoset Brain: Comparisons with Relaxometry and Histology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Spectral Registration Using Deep Learning 94%
- Test-retest reproducibility of in vivo magnetization transfer ratio and saturation index in mice at 9.4 Tesla 93%
- Correction of Artifacts Induced by B0 Inhomogeneities in Breast MRI using Reduced Field-of-View Echo-Planar Imaging and Enhanced Reverse Polarity Gradient Method 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.