Back

The efficacy, safety and immunogenicity Nanocovax: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial.

Nguyen, T. P.; Do, Q.; Phan, L. T.; Anh, D. D.; Khong, H.; Dinh, D. V.; Hoang, L. V.; Nguyen, T. V.; Pham, H. N.; Chu, M. V.; Nguyen, T. T.; Le, T. M.; Trang, T. T. N.; Dinh, T. T.; Vo, T. V.; Vu, T. T.; Nguyen, Q. B. P.; Phan, V. T.; Nguyen, L. V.; Nguyen, G. T.; Tran, P. M.; Nghiem, T. D.; Tran, T. V.; Nguyen, T. G.; Tran, T. Q.; Nguyen, L. T.; Do, A. T.; Nguyen, D. D.; Ho, S. A.; Nguyen, V. T.; Pham, D. T.; Tran, H. B.; Vu, S. T.; Hoang, S. X.; Do, T. M.; Nguyen, X. T.; Le, G. Q.; Tran, T.; Cao, T. M.; Dao, H. M.; Nguyen, T. T. T.; Doan, U. Y.; Le, V. T. T.; Tran, L. P.; Nguyen, N. M.; Nguy

2022-03-23 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.03.22.22272739 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNanocovax is a recombinant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 subunit vaccine composed of full-length prefusion stabilized recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoproteins (S-2P) and aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. In a Phase 1 and 2 studies, (NCT04683484) the vaccine was found to be safe and induce a robust immune response in healthy adult participants. MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of the Nanocovax vaccine against Covid-19 in approximately 13,007 volunteers aged 18 years and over. The immunogenicity was assessed based on Anti-S IgG antibody response, surrogate virus neutralization, wild-type SARS-CoV-2 neutralization and the types of helper T-cell response by intracellular staining (ICS) for interferon gamma (IFNg) and interleukin-4 (IL-4). The vaccine efficacy (VE) was calculated basing on serologically confirmed cases of Covid-19. FindingsUp to day 180, incidences of solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AE) were similar between vaccine and placebo groups. 100 serious adverse events (SAE) were observed in both vaccine and placebo groups (out of total 13007 participants). 96 out of these 100 SAEs were determined to be unrelated to the investigational products. 4 SAEs were possibly related, as determined by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) and investigators. Reactogenicity was absent or mild in the majority of participants and of short duration. These findings highlight the excellent safety profile of Nanocovax. Regarding immunogenicity, Nanocovax induced robust IgG and neutralizing antibody responses. Importantly, Anti S-IgG levels and neutralizing antibody titers on day 42 were higher than those of natural infected cases. Nanocovax was found to induce Th2 polarization rather than Th1. Post-hoc analysis showed that the VE against symptomatic disease was 51.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] was [34.4%-64.1%]. VE against severe illness and death were 93.3% [62.2-98.1]. Notably, the dominant strain during the period of this study was Delta variant. InterpretationNanocovax 25 microgram (mcg) was found to be safe with the efficacy against symptomatic infection of Delta variant of 51.5%. FundingResearch was funded by Nanogen Pharmaceutical Biotechnology JSC., and the Ministry of Science and Technology of Vietnam; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04922788.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
5
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.8%
6
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
8
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
9
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
10
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
15
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
24
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%