Back

SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins uptake mediated by lipid raft ganglioside GM1 in human cerebrovascular cells

McQuaid, C.; Solorzano, A.; Dickerson, I.; Deane, R.

2022-03-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.03.20.485050 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While there is clinical evidence of neurological manifestation in coronavirus disease-19, its unclear whether this is due to differential severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) uptake from blood by cells of the cerebrovasculature. SARS-CoV-2 and its spike protein (SP) interact with the endothelium but the roles of extracellular peptidase domain on angiotensin converting enzyme 2 receptors (ACE2) and ACE2 independent pathways (such as glycans) are not fully elucidated. In addition, for SARS-CoV-2 to enter the brain parenchyma from blood it has to cross several cell types, including the endothelium, pericytes and vascular smooth muscle. Since SARS-CoV-2 interacts with host cells via it SP at the entry point of it life cycle, we used fluorescently labelled SP (SP-555) (wild type and mutants) to model viral behaviour, in vitro, for these cell types (endothelial, pericytes and vascular smooth muscle) to explore pathways of viral entry into brain from blood. There was differential SP uptake by these cell types. The endothelial cells had the least uptake, which may limit SP uptake into brain from blood. Uptake was mediated by ACE2, but it was dependent on SP interaction with ganglioside GM1 in the lipid raft. Mutation sites, N501Yand E484K and D614G, as seen in variants of interest, were differentially taken up by these cell types. There was greater uptake but neutralization with anti-ACE2 and anti-GM1antibodies was less effective. Our data suggested that GM1/lipid raft is an important entry point of SARS-CoV-2 into these cells since inhibition of SP uptake with both anti-ACE2 and anti-GM1 together was similar to that with only anti-GM1, and both ACE2 and GM1 are within the lipid raft region of plasma membrane. Thus, GM1 is a potential SARS-CoV-2 and therapeutic target at the cerebrovasculature.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
3
Journal of Neurochemistry
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
5
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
10
Glycobiology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Journal of Biomedical Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
13
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
14
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
18
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
19
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
20
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
22
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
23
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
25
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
26
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
29
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
30
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%