Back

Syrah, a Slide-seqV2 pipeline augmentation

Brewster, C. E.; Mann, F. G.; Benham-Pyle, B. W.; Sanchez Alvarado, A.

2022-03-21 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.03.20.485023 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial transcriptomic techniques such as Slide-seqV2 uncover novel relationships and interactions between cell types by coupling gene expression and spatial data. Here we discuss two unexpected sources of error in Slide-seqV2 data, one physical and one computational. To address this we present an analysis pipeline augmentation, Syrah, which corrects for these errors and show that it improves both data quantity and quality over the standard pipeline alone or in combination with additional sequencing.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
11.5%
Similar papers in this journal
3
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.6%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.5%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.3%
7
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.1%
9
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.4%
12
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.1%
15
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
17
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%
18
BMC Biology
○ 265 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.