Immunogenic superiority and safety of Biological E CORBEVAX vaccine compared to COVISHIELD (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine studied in a phase III, single blind, multicenter, randomized clinical trial
Thuluva, S.; Paradkar, V.; Turaga, K.; Gunneri, S.; Yerroju, V.; Mogulla, R. R.; Pothakamuri, V. S.; Kyasani, M.; Manoharan, S.; Adabala, S.; Javvadi, A. S.; Medigeshi, G. R.; Singh, J.; Shaman, H.; Binayke, A.; Zaheer, A.; Awasrhi, A.; Singh, C.; A, V. R.; Basu, I.; Khobragade, A. A. K.; Pandey, A. K.
Show abstract
BackgroundOptimum formulation of Biological Es CORBEVAX vaccine that contains protein sub unit of Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) from the spike protein of SARS-COV-2 formulated with aluminum hydroxide (Al3+) and CpG1018 as adjuvants was selected in phase-1 and 2 studies and proven to be safe, well tolerated and immunogenic in healthy adult population. In the current study, additional data was generated to determine immunogenic superiority of CORBEVAX vaccine over COVISHIELD vaccine and safety in larger and older population. MethodsThis is a phase III prospective, single blinded, randomized, active controlled study (CTRI/2021/08/036074) conducted at 20 sites across India in healthy adults aged between 18-80 years. This study has two arms; immunogenicity arm and safety arm. Participants in immunogenicity arm were randomized equally to either CORBEVAX or COVISHIELD vaccination groups to determine the immunogenic superiority. Healthy adults without a history of Covid-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection, were enrolled. FindingsThe safety profile of CORBEVAX vaccine was comparable to the comparator vaccine COVISHIELD in terms of overall AE rates, related AE rates and medically attended AEs. Majority of reported AEs were mild in nature, and overall CORBEVAX appeared to cause fewer local and systemic adverse reactions/events. Overall, two grade-3 serious AEs (Dengue fever and femur fracture) were reported and they are unrelated to study vaccine. Neutralizing Antibody titers, against both Ancestral and Delta strain, induced post two-dose vaccination regimen were higher in the CORBEVAX arm as compared to COVISHIELD and the analysis of GMT ratios demonstrated immunogenic superiority of CORBEVAX in comparison with COVISHIELD. Both CORBEVAX and COVISHIELD vaccines showed comparable seroconversion post vaccination when assessed against anti-RBD IgG response. The subjects in CORBEVAX cohort also exhibited higher Interferon-gamma secreting PBMCs post stimulation with SARS-COV-2 RBD peptides than the subjects in COVISHIELD cohort. InterpretationsNeutralizing antibody titers induced by CORBEVAX vaccine against Delta and Ancestral strains were protective, indicative of vaccine effectiveness of >90% for prevention of symptomatic infections based on the Correlates of Protection assessment performed during Moderna and Astra-Zeneca vaccine Phase III studies. Safety findings revealed that CORBEVAX vaccine has excellent safety profile when tested in larger and older population. FundingBIRAC-division of Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations funded the study.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of Biological E’s CORBEVAX™ vaccine in children and adolescents: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo controlled, Phase-2/3 Study 99%
- Immunogenicity and Safety of a 14-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (PNEUBEVAX 14TM) administered to 6-8 weeks old healthy Indian Infants: A single blind, randomized, active-controlled, Phase-III study 98%
- A randomized, double-blind phase I clinical trial of two recombinant dimeric RBD COVID-19 vaccine candidates: safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine in adolescents aged 12-17 years in Thai population, prospective cohort study 98%
- Immunogenicity and adverse events of priming with inactivated whole SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) followed by boosting the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine 97%
- Safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous booster of protein subunit vaccine MVC-COV1901 after two doses of adenoviral vector vaccine AZD1222 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review of spontaneously reported data from the UK, Europe, and the US and of the literature 94%
- Safety and effectiveness of dose-sparing strategies for seasonal influenza vaccine: a rapid scoping review of fractional dosing of the intramuscular influenza vaccine 94%
- COVID-19 vaccines and evidence-based medicine 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous booster with an RBD virus-like particle vaccine following two- or three-dose inactivated COVID-19 vaccine 97%
- Safety and immunogenicity of SCB-2019, an adjuvanted, recombinant SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S-protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine in healthy 12–17 year-old adolescents 96%
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity against the SARS-CoV-2 variants following heterologous primary series involving CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 plus heterologous BNT162b2 booster vaccination: An open-label randomized study in healthy Thai adults 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and Safety Following a Homologous Booster Dose of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine (NVX-CoV2373): A Phase 2 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 96%
- A Phase 1: Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-BBV152 95%
- Immunogenicity and safety of a third dose, and immune persistence of CoronaVac vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: interim results from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.