Back

APOE ϵ2 vs APOE ϵ4 dosage shows sex-specific links to hippocampus-default network subregion co-variation

Savignac, C.; Villeneuve, S.; Badhwar, A.; Saltoun, K.; Shafighi, K.; Zajner, C.; Sharma, V.; Taliun, S. A. G.; Farhan, S.; Poirier, J.; Bzdok, D.

2022-03-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.03.15.484482 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Alzheimers disease and related dementias (ADRD) are marked by intracellular tau aggregates in the medial-temporal lobe (MTL) and extracellular amyloid aggregates in the default network (DN). Here, we sought to clarify ADRD-related co-dependencies between the MTLs most vulnerable structure, the hippocampus (HC), and the highly associative DN at a subregion resolution. We confronted the effects of APOE {varepsilon}2 and {varepsilon}4, rarely investigated together, with their impact on HC-DN co-variation regimes at the population level. In a two-pronged decomposition of structural brain scans from [~]40,000 UK Biobank participants, we located co-deviating structural patterns in HC and DN subregions as a function of ADRD family risk. Across the disclosed HC-DN signatures, recurrent deviations in the CA1, CA2/3, molecular layer, fornixs fimbria, and their cortical partners related to ADRD risk. Phenome-wide profiling of HC-DN co- variation expressions from these population signatures revealed male-specific associations with air-pollution, and female-specific associations with cardiovascular traits. We highlighted three main factors associated with brain-APOE associations across the different gene variants: happiness, and satisfaction with friendships, and with family. We further showed that APOE {varepsilon}2/2 interacts preferentially with HC-DN co-variation patterns in estimating social lifestyle in males and physical activity in females. Our findings reinvigorate the often-neglected interplay between APOE {varepsilon}2 dosage and sex, which we have linked to fine-grained structural divergences indicative of ADRD susceptibility.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.