Back

How Hippocampus Solves Inverse Problems: A Circuit Hypothesis

Arathorn, D. W.

2022-03-18 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.03.15.484469 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This paper proposes an explicit computational process which reproduces what are considered to be two essential experimentally observed hippocampus capabilities. These are path planning and determining the chain of ordered relationships which bind two concepts. These are both inverse problems. The paper presents algorithmic simulations of the process and a neuronal circuit (and variants) with the same dataflow, both consistent with the known neuroanatomy of the hippocampus. The process described here is purpose-built for hippocampus

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Neural Computation
● 39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.1%
Similar papers in this journal
6
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
7
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.3%
8
Neural Networks
○ 35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
eneuro
● 439 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
10
Hippocampus
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
12
Biological Cybernetics
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
13
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
○ 41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
14
Frontiers in Neuroscience
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
15
Neuroinformatics
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Mathematical Biosciences
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
17
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Physiology
○ 106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Biosystems
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Journal of Neurophysiology
● 302 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Brain Structure and Function
○ 93 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Physical Review E
● 112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.